My Account Log in

2 options

Best practices : high levels of knowledge at key points differentiate commercial shipbuilding from Navy shipbuilding : report to congressional committees.

Online

Available online

View online

ProQuest Congressional Research Digital Collection: Part B (2004-2010) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
United States. Government Accountability Office.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Navy--Procurement.
United States.
United States. Navy.
Shipbuilding--United States--Costs.
Shipbuilding.
Shipbuilding contracts--Prices--United States.
Shipbuilding contracts.
Defense industries--United States.
Defense industries.
Prices.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (ii, 70 pages :) : illustrations, map, digital, PDF file
Other Title:
High levels of knowledge at key points differentiate commercial shipbuilding from Navy shipbuilding
Best practices in shipbuilding
Place of Publication:
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2009]
System Details:
text file
PDF
Summary:
Cost growth is a prevalent problem in Navy shipbuilding programs, particularly for the first ships in new classes. In response to a mandate in the conference report accompanying the Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2008, GAO undertook this review to (1) identify key practices employed by leading commercial ship buyers and shipbuilders that ensure satisfactory cost, schedule, and ship performance; (2) determine the extent to which Navy shipbuilding programs employ these practices; and (3) evaluate how commercial and Navy business environments incentivize the use of best practices. To address these objectives, GAO visited leading commercial ship buyers and shipbuilders, reviewed its prior Navy work, and convened a panel of shipbuilding experts. GAO suggests Congress consider refining required reporting to include additional design stability metrics. GAO is also making recommendations to the Secretary of Defense aimed at improving shipbuilding programs by balancing requirements and resources early, retiring technical risk and stabilizing design at key points, moving to fixed-price contracts for lead ships, evaluating in-house management capability, and assessing if the desired fleet size sufficiently constrains the cost and technical content of new ships. The Department of Defense agreed with five recommendations and partially agreed with two. GAO believes all recommendations remain valid.
Notes:
Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
Includes bibliographical references.
Electronic reproduction. [Bethesda, Md.] : ProQuest, 2004. digital, PDF file. ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. Mode of access: World Wide Web via ProQuest website.
Other Format:
Print version: United States. Government Accountability Office. Best practices
Microfiche version: United States. Government Accountability Office. Best practices. CIS 2009 J942-367
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account