My Account Log in

2 options

Defense acquisitions : production and fielding of missile defense components continue with less testing and validation than planned : report to congressional committees.

Online

Available online

View online

ProQuest Congressional Research Digital Collection: Part B (2004-2010) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
United States. Government Accountability Office.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Missile Defense Agency--Procurement.
United States.
United States. Missile Defense Agency--Management.
United States. Missile Defense Agency.
Ballistic missile defenses--United States--Finance.
Ballistic missile defenses.
Defense contracts--United States.
Defense contracts.
Finance.
Management.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (iv, 104 pages, digital, PDF file)
Other Title:
Production and fielding of missile defense components continue with less testing and validation than planned
Place of Publication:
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2009]
System Details:
text file
Summary:
The 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission recommended that the Department of Defense (DOD) establish 12 joint bases by consolidating the management and support of 26 separate installations, potentially saving $2.3 billion over 20 years. In response to a direction from the House Armed Services Committee report accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009, GAO evaluated DOD's (1) efforts and expected costs to deliver installation support at joint bases and (2) funding for facility sustainment, which includes the maintenance and repair activities necessary to keep facilities in good working order, at all installations. GAO compared new support standards with the current support levels, visited nine installations that will become four joint bases, and compared facility sustainment funding levels with requirements and goals. GAO recommends that DOD (1) periodically review the newly established installation support standards and joint base administrative costs to help ensure economies and efficiencies and (2) report to Congress on the estimated installation support costs at the joint bases and on facility sustainment funds used for other purposes.
Notes:
Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
Includes bibliographical references.
Electronic reproduction. [Bethesda, Md.] : ProQuest, 2004. digital, PDF file. ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. Mode of access: World Wide Web via ProQuest website.
Other Format:
Print version: United States. Government Accountability Office. Defense acquisitions
Microfiche version: United States. Government Accountability Office. Defense acquisitions. CIS 2009 J942-222
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account