U.S. asylum system : agencies have taken actions to help ensure quality in the asylum adjudication process, but challenges remain : report to congressional requesters / [GAO contact, Richard M. Stana].

Format:

Book

Government document

Author/Creator:

Stana, Richard M.

Contributor:

United States. Government Accountability Office.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Asylum, Right of--United States.

Asylum, Right of.

United States.

Political refugees--Legal status, laws, etc--United States.

Political refugees.

Political refugees--Legal status, laws, etc.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (iv, 154 pages :) : illustrations, digital, PDF file

Other Title:

United States asylum system : agencies have taken actions to help ensure quality in the asylum adjudication process, but challenges remain

Agencies have taken actions to help ensure quality in the asylum adjudication process, but challenges remain

Asylum challenges

Place of Publication:

[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Government Accountability Office, [2008]

System Details:

text file

PDF

Summary:

Each year, tens of thousands of noncitizens apply in the United States for asylum, which provides refuge to those who have been persecuted or fear persecution. Asylum officers (AO) in the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and immigration judges (IJ) in the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) assess applicants' credibility and eligibility. GAO was asked to evaluate aspects of the asylum system. This report addresses the extent to which quality assurance mechanisms have been designed to ensure adjudications' integrity, how key factors affect AOs' adjudications, and what key factors affect IJs' adjudications. To conduct this work, GAO reviewed agency documents, policies, and procedures; surveyed all AOs, supervisory AOs, and IJs; and visited three of the eight Asylum Offices. These offices varied in size and percentage of cases granted asylum. Results of these visits provided additional information but were not projectable. USCIS and EOIR have designed quality assurance mechanisms to help ensure the integrity of asylum adjudications, but some can be improved. While 75 percent of AO survey respondents reported that basic training prepared them at least moderately well to adjudicate cases, they also reported that despite weekly training, they needed additional training to help them detect fraud, conduct security checks, and assess the credibility of asylum seekers. The Asylum Division does not consistently solicit AOs' and supervisory AOs' input on a range of their training needs. Without this, the Asylum Division lacks key information for making training decisions. The Asylum Division has designed a quality review framework to ensure the quality and consistency of asylum decisions. Although supervisors review all cases and headquarters reviews certain cases, other local quality assurance reviews rarely took place in three of the eight Asylum Offices primarily due to.

Of suspected fraud and receive information to aid in fraud detection. Eighty-two percent of IJs reported time limitations as moderately or very challenging aspects of their adjudications. EOIR has detailed IJs to courts with high caseloads and plans to hire additional staff, but it is too soon to know the extent to which additional staff will alleviate IJs' time challenges.

Notes:

Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.

Includes bibliographical references.

Electronic reproduction. [Bethesda, Md.] : ProQuest, 2004. digital, PDF file. ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. Mode of access: World Wide Web via ProQuest website.

Other Format:

Print version: U.S. asylum system

Microfiche version: U.S. asylum system. CIS 2008 J942-471

Access Restriction:

Restricted for use by site license.