2 options
Sentencing Levels for Crack and Powder Cocaine : Kimbrough v. United States and the Impact of United States v. Booker.
- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Courts.
- Crime.
- Judge-made law.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (24 pages, digital, PDF file)
- Place of Publication:
- [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 2008.
- System Details:
- text file
- Summary:
- Examines issues raised by the Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. Booker, which declared that the Federal sentencing guidelines set by the U.S. Sentencing Commission for crack and powder cocaine offenses must be considered advisory rather than mandatory. Discusses pending Kimbrough v. U.S. in which Supreme Court will determine Federal trial court authority to impose a sentence below that called for under sentencing guidelines. Summarizes legislative solutions proposed to eliminate crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparities.
- Notes:
- Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
- CRS Report.
- Other Format:
- Microfiche version: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Sentencing Levels for Crack and Powder Cocaine
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.