Hudson v. Michigan : The Exclusionary Rule's Applicability to "Knock-and-Announce" Violations.

Format:

Book

Government document

Author/Creator:

Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Constitutional law.

Evidence.

Searches and seizures.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (5 pages, digital, PDF file)

Place of Publication:

[Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 2006.

System Details:

text file

Summary:

Discusses 2006 Supreme Court decision in Hudson v. Michigan, in which the Court narrowed the applicability of Fourth Amendment-based exclusionary rule, which generally states that evidence secured in violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable search and seizures may not be used against the defendant in Federal or State criminal trials.

Notes:

Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.

CRS Report.

Other Format:

Microfiche version: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Hudson v. Michigan

Access Restriction:

Restricted for use by site license.