2 options
Why Certain Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Executive-legislative relations.
- Constitutional law.
- Cloture.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (6 pages, digital, PDF file)
- Place of Publication:
- [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 2006.
- System Details:
- text file
- Summary:
- Discusses why trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, World Trade Organization agreements, and multilateral and bilateral free trade agreements are subject to a majority vote of both Houses of Congress rather than a two-thirds vote of the Senate. Examines the statutory authority for trade agreements, the development of the statutory trade agreements program, and the constitutionality of Congressional-executive trade agreements.
- Notes:
- Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
- CRS Report.
- Other Format:
- Microfiche version: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Why Certain Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.