Urban universities and colleges as anchor institutions: An examination of institutional management practices / Harriel, Holly Elizabeth.

Format:

Book

Thesis/Dissertation

Author/Creator:

Harriel, Holly Elizabeth, author.

Contributor:

Hartley, J. Matthew, degree supervisor.

Moneta, Lawrence, degree committee member.

Maurrasse, David, 1968- degree committee member.

University of Pennsylvania. Higher Education Management, degree granting institution.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Educational administration.

Urban planning.

Public policy.

0514.

0999.

0630.

Local Subjects:

Educational administration.

Urban planning.

Public policy.

0514.

0999.

0630.

Genre:

Academic theses.

Physical Description:

1 electronic resource (183 pages)

Contained In:

Dissertation Abstracts International 77-01A(E).

Place of Publication:

Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015.

Language Note:

English

Summary:

In the last twenty years, anchor institutions such as universities and academic medical centers have been addressing societal problems in building a more democratic, just, and equitable society (Taylor, 2013). Anchor institutions are those nonprofit or corporate entities that, by reason of mission, invested capital, or relationships to customers or employees, are geographically tied to a certain location (Porter, 2002; Taylor, 2013).

This study sought to understand what organizational capacity is needed by urban universities in order to undertake large-scale neighborhood revitalization efforts. This study used qualitative research methods to examine the University of Chicago's Washington Park Incubator project, established in 2011, and Johns Hopkins University's East Baltimore Development Initiative, established in 2001. Through 22 interviews with executive and senior university officials, leaders of community-based organizations and neighborhood residents, this study sought to answer two research questions: What strategies do anchor institutions use to seed, support and sustain their anchor initiatives? What are the barriers or complexities to forming sustainable agreements and cohesion around partnership collaboration?

This study found that IHE anchors use three critical strategies to sustain their work: the role and actions of a university's president, the role of the board of trustees, and the use of community boundary spanners as leaders of partnerships. A major barrier to sustainability and a primary challenge to achieving cohesive partnership agreements with partners is historical mistrust. The findings were situated within a university real estate investment model (Austrian & Norton, 2005), an engaged institutions leadership model (Sandmann & Plater, 2009), and a framework for community boundary spanners (Weerts & Sandmann, 2010) to explain how these models impact the sustainability of IHE anchor initiatives.

Conclusions drawn from this study will equip urban college and university executive and senior leaders and operational administrators as well as community leaders with insight into how to sustain anchor institution partnerships.

Notes:

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.

Advisors: J. Matthew Hartley Committee members: David Maurrasse; Lawrence Moneta.

Ed.D. University of Pennsylvania 2015.

Local Notes:

School code: 0175

ISBN:

9781339022239