2 options
Theory of decision under uncertainty / Itzhak Gilboa.
Connect to full text Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Gilboa, Itzhak.
- Series:
- Econometric Society monographs ; no. 45.
- Econometric Society monographs ; 45
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Decision making.
- Uncertainty (Information theory).
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (xiv, 214 pages).
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2009.
- System Details:
- text file
- Contents:
- I Intuitive Definitions 1
- 1 Motivating Examples 3
- 2 Free Will and Determinism 5
- 2.1 Can Free Choice Be Predicted? 5
- 2.2 Is the World Deterministic? 6
- 2.3 Is Free Will Observable? 6
- 2.4 The Problem of Free Will 7
- 2.5 A Rational Illusion 10
- 2.6 Free Will and the Decision Matrix 12
- 3 The Principle of Indifference 14
- 3.1 Will a Canonical Space Help? 14
- 3.1.1 The Canonical State Space 14
- 3.1.2 Difficulties with a Uniform Prior on [0, 1] 15
- 3.1.3 Conclusion 16
- 3.2 What's Special about the Coin? 17
- 3.2.1 Symmetry 17
- 3.2.2 Smooth Beliefs 18
- 4 Relative Frequencies 20
- 4.1 The Law of Large Numbers 20
- 4.2 The Problem of Induction 21
- 4.2.1 Hume's Critique 21
- 4.2.2 Goodman's Grue-Bleen Paradox 22
- 4.2.3 Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Dependence of Language 23
- 4.2.4 Grue-Bleen Again 26
- 4.2.5 Evolutionary Explanations 31
- 4.3 Problems with the Frequentist Approach 34
- 5 Subjective Probabilities 37
- 5.1 Linda the Bank Teller 37
- 5.2 Pascal's Wager 38
- 5.3 Classical versus Bayesian Statistics 40
- 5.3.1 Basic Definitions 40
- 5.3.2 The Gambler Fallacy 41
- 5.3.3 Exchangeability 42
- 5.3.4 Confidence Is Not Probability 44
- 5.3.5 Classical Statistics Can Be Ridiculous 45
- 5.3.6 Different Methods for Different Goals 46
- II Behavioral Definitions 49
- 6 A Case Study 51
- 6.1 A Characterization Theorem for Maximization of Utility 51
- 6.2 Proof 53
- 6.3 Interpretations 55
- 6.3.1 A Few Definitions 56
- 6.3.2 A Meta-Scientific Interpretation 59
- 6.3.3 A Normative Interpretation 62
- 6.3.4 A Descriptive Interpretation 63
- 6.4 Limitations 64
- 6.4.1 Semiorders 65
- 6.4.2 Other Ways to Measure Utility 71
- 7 The Role of Theories 72
- 7.1 Theories Are Always Wrong 72
- 7.2 Theories and Conceptual Frameworks 74
- 7.3 Logical Positivism as a Metaphor 76
- 8 Von Neumann-Morgenstern's Theorem 78
- 8.1 Background 78
- 8.2 The Theorem 79
- 8.3 Proofs 83
- 8.3.1 The Algebraic Approach 83
- 8.3.2 A Geometric Approach 84
- 8.3.3 A Separation Argument 85
- 8.4 The Three Interpretations 86
- 9 De Finetti's Theorem 89
- 9.1 Motivation 89
- 9.2 The Theorem 90
- 9.3 A Proof 91
- 9.4 The Three Interpretations 92
- 10 Savage's Theorem 94
- 10.1 Background 94
- 10.2 States, Outcomes, and Acts 96
- 10.3 Axioms 97
- 10.3.1 P1 97
- 10.3.2 P2 97
- 10.3.3 Notation 99
- 10.3.4 Null Events 99
- 10.3.5 P3 100
- 10.3.6 P4 102
- 10.3.7 P5 102
- 10.3.8 P6 103
- 10.3.9 P7 104
- 10.4 The Result for a Finite Outcome Set 105
- 10.4.1 Finitely Additive Measures 105
- 10.4.2 Nonatomic Measures 107
- 10.4.3 The Theorem 108
- 10.5 The Case of a General Outcome Set 108
- 10.6 Interpretations 109
- 10.7 The Proof and Qualitative Probabilities 110
- 11 The Definition of States 113
- 11.1 Causality 113
- 11.1.1 Newcomb's Paradox 113
- 11.1.2 States as Functions from Acts to Outcomes 114
- 11.1.3 A Problem 115
- 11.2 Hempel's Paradox of Confirmation 116
- 11.2.1 Are All Ravens Black? 116
- 11.2.2 A State-Space Formulation 117
- 11.2.3 What Is a Confirmation? 117
- 11.2.4 A Resolution 118
- 11.2.5 Good's Variation 118
- 11.2.6 What Do We Learn from This? 119
- 11.3 Monty Hall Three-Door Game 120
- 12 A Critique of Savage 123
- 12.1 Criticizing Critiques 123
- 12.1.1 An Example 123
- 12.1.2 The General Lesson 124
- 12.2 Critique of P3 and P4 125
- 12.2.1 Example 125
- 12.2.2 Defense 126
- 12.2.3 State-Dependent Utility 127
- 12.2.4 The Definition of Subjective Probability 128
- 12.2.5 When Is State Dependence Necessary? 129
- 12.3 Critique of P1 and P2 130
- 12.3.1 The Basic Problem 130
- 12.3.2 Reasoned Choice versus Raw Preferences 131
- 12.3.3 Schmeidler's Critique and Ellsberg's Paradox 132
- 12.3.4 Observability of States 136
- 12.3.5 Problems of Complexity 137
- 13 Objectivity and Rationality 138
- 13.1 Subjectivity and Objectivity 138
- 13.2 Objective and Subjective Rationality 139
- 14 Anscombe-Aumann's Theorem 142
- III Alternative Behavioral Theories 145
- 15 Choquet Expected Utility 147
- 15.1 Schmeidler's Intuition 147
- 15.2 Choquet Integral 149
- 15.3 Comonotonicity 150
- 15.4 Axioms and Result 151
- 16 Prospect Theory 154
- 16.1 Background 154
- 16.2 Gain-Loss Asymmetry 154
- 16.3 Distortion of Probabilities 156
- 16.4 Rank-Dependent Probabilities and Choquet Integration 158
- 17 Maxmin Expected Utility 160
- 17.1 Convex Games 160
- 17.2 A Cognitive Interpretation of CEU 161
- 17.3 Axioms and Result 163
- 17.4 Interpretation of MMEU 163
- 17.5 Generalizations and Variations 165
- 17.6 Bewley's Alternative Approach 165
- 17.7 Combining Objective and Subjective Rationality 166
- 17.8 Applications 168
- IV Cognitive Origins 171
- 18 Case-Based Qualitative Beliefs 173
- 18.1 Axioms and Result 173
- 18.2 Four Known Techniques 175
- 18.3 The Combination Axiom in General Analogical Reasoning 177
- 18.4 Violations of the Combination Axiom 179
- 19 Frequentism Revisited 180
- 19.1 Similarity-Weighted Empirical Frequencies 180
- 19.2 Intuition 181
- 19.3 Axiomatization 182
- 19.4 Empirical Similarity and Objective Probabilities 184
- 20 Future Research 188.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages [191]-198) and index.
- Electronic reproduction. Cambridge Available via World Wide Web.
- Description based on print version record.
- Local Notes:
- Acquired for the Penn Libraries with assistance from the Rosengarten Family Fund.
- ISBN:
- 9780511840203
- 0511840209
- Publisher Number:
- 99966742045
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.