My Account Log in

1 option

Intimate exegesis : reading and feeling in early modern devotional literature / Bronwyn V. Wallace.

LIBRA PE001 2015 .W1876
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Manuscript
Thesis/Dissertation
Author/Creator:
Wallace, Bronwyn V., author.
Contributor:
De Grazia, Margreta, degree supervisor.
Lesser, Zachary, degree committee member.
Sanchez, Melissa E., degree committee member.
Stallybrass, Peter, degree committee member.
University of Pennsylvania. Department of English.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Penn dissertations--English.
English--Penn dissertations.
Local Subjects:
Penn dissertations--English.
English--Penn dissertations.
Physical Description:
vii, 150 leaves : color illustrations ; 29 cm
Production:
[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania] : University of Pennsylvania, 2015.
Summary:
"Intimate Exegesis" proposes that early modern devotional literature offers feeling, and particularly bad feeling, as a productive matrix for interpretation. In this body of work, feeling--haptic, sensory, affective--generates an intimacy between reader and text in a reading practice that is also a means of coping with the tremendous gap between life in the fallen world and divine perfection. In an unlikely union that I argue involves a powerful shared approach to affect, embodiment, and interpretation, I bring patristic theology together with feminist and queer theory to address how Robert Southwell, Anne Lock, Aemilia Lanyer, and Katherine Philips develop sophisticated interpretive practices out of mourning, recalcitrance, despair, nostalgia, and failure, all grounded in the peculiar passions of embodied femininity. In their work, difficult or even destructive feeling is not an obstacle to reading and devotion, but rather enables the reader's identification with and even desire for the text she reads. While recent debates in early modern studies have pitted historicism against queer temporality, devotional practice suggests that to read historically is--has always been--to read anachronically. The negative affects that Southwell, Lock, Lanyer, and Philips introduce to their scenes of leverage the properties of form and rhetoric to approach distant pasts, imagine radical futures, and above all to slow down the time of reading and the time of worldly politics, to stand still, to refuse to move on.
Notes:
Ph. D. University of Pennsylvania 2015.
Department: English.
Supervisor: Margreta de Grazia.
Includes bibliographical references.
OCLC:
945583603

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account