My Account Log in

2 options

National Survey of Juvenile Justice Professionals, 2005-2007 [United States] / Janeen Buck Willison , Christy Visher , Daniel P. Mears , Jeffrey A. Butts .

Online

Available online

View online

ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research) Available online

View online
Format:
Datafile
Contributor:
Willison, Janeen Buck.
Visher, Christy.
Mears, Daniel P., 1966-
Butts, Jeffrey A.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Series:
ICPSR (Series) ; 26381.
ICPSR ; 26381
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource.
Edition:
2013-03-21.
Place of Publication:
Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013.
System Details:
data file
Summary:
This study involved a survey of juvenile court judges, chief probation officers, prosecutors, and public defenders to measure their impressions of recent policy changes and the critical needs facing today's juvenile justice system. In addition the study garnered recommendations for improving the administration and effectiveness of this system. The study's primary objective was to provide policymakers, administrators, and practitioners with actionable information about how to improve the operations and effectiveness of the juvenile justice system, and to examine the role practitioners could play in constructing sound juvenile justice policy. A total of 534 juvenile court judges, chief probation officers, court administrators, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in 44 states and the District of Columbia participated in the Assessing the Policy Options (APO) national practitioner survey. The survey consisted of four major sections: demographics, critical needs, policies and practices, and practitioner recommendations. Critical needs facing the juvenile justice system were measured by asking respondents about the policy priority of 13 issues in their respective jurisdictions; topics ranged from staff training and development to effective juvenile defense counsel to information technology. Respondents were also asked to assess the effectiveness of 17 different policies and practices -- ranging from parental accountability laws to transfer and treatment -- in achieving 6 vital juvenile justice outcomes. Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26381.v1
Notes:
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-01-05.
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account