My Account Log in

2 options

Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE), 2003-2009 / Shelli B. Rossman , John K. Roman , Janine M. Zweig , Michael Rempel , Christine H. Lindquist .

Online

Available online

View online

ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research) Available online

View online
Format:
Datafile
Contributor:
Rossman, Shelli B.
Roman, John K.
Zweig, Janine M.
Rempel, Michael.
Lindquist, Christine H.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Series:
ICPSR (Series) ; 30983.
ICPSR ; 30983
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource.
Edition:
2012-11-05.
Place of Publication:
Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2012.
System Details:
data file
Summary:
The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE) study included 23 drug courts and 6 comparison sites selected from 8 states across the country. The purpose of the study was to: (1) Test whether drug courts reduce drug use, crime, and multiple other problems associated with drug abuse, in comparision with similar offenders not exposed to drug courts, (2) address how drug courts work and for whom by isolating key individual and program factors that make drug courts more or less effective in achieving their desired outcomes, (3) explain how offender attitudes and behaviors change when they are exposed to drug courts and how these changes help explain the effectiveness of drug court programs, and (4) examine whether drug courts generate cost savings. Offenders in all 29 sites were surveyed in 3 waves, at baseline, 6 months later, and 18 months after enrollment. The research comprises three major components: process evaluation, impact evaluation, and a cost-benefit analysis. The process evaluation describes how the 23 drug court sites vary in program eligibility, supervision, treatment, team collaboration, and other key policies and practices. The impact evaluation examines whether drug courts produce better outcomes than comparison sites and tests which court policies and offender attitudes might explain those effects. The cost-benefit analysis evaluates drug court costs and benefits. Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1
Notes:
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-01-05.
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account