2 options
Afrobarometer Round 5 [electronic resource] : The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Uganda, 2012/ Frederick Golooba-Mutebi, E. Gyimah-Boadi, Michael Bratton, Robert Mattes, Carolyn Logan, Boniface Dulani.
- Format:
- Other
- Series:
- ICPSR (Series) 35567.
- ICPSR 35567
- Afrobarometer Survey Series
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource.
- Edition:
- 2015-09-08
- Place of Publication:
- Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2015.
- System Details:
- Mode of access: World Wide Web.
- Summary:
- The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that collects and disseminates data regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, the economic, civil society, and related issues. The data is collected from nationally representative samples in face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent's choice. Standard topics for the Afrobarometer include attitudes toward and evaluations of democracy, governance and economic conditions, political participation, national identify, and social capital. In addition, Round 5 surveys included special modules on taxation; gender issues; crime, conflict and insecurity; globalization; and social service delivery. The surveys also collect a large set of socio-demographic indicators such as age, gender, education level, poverty level, language and ethnicity, and religious affiliation, as well as political party affiliation. Afrobarometer Round 5 surveys were implemented in 35 countries. This particular data collection was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Uganda, and also includes a number of "country-specific questions" designed specifically for the Uganda survey.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35567.v1
- Contents:
- Afrobarometer Round 5: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Uganda, 2012
- Notes:
- Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-03-09.
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.