1 option
Common core dilemma-- : who owns our schools? / Mercedes K. Schneider ; foreword by Carol Corbett Burris.
Van Pelt Library LB3060.83 .S357 2015
Available
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Schneider, Mercedes K. (Mercedes Katherine)
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Common Core State Standards (Education).
- Education--Standards--United States.
- Education.
- Education--Standards.
- United States.
- Education and state--United States.
- Education and state.
- Business and education--United States.
- Business and education.
- Physical Description:
- xv, 245 pages ; 23 cm
- Place of Publication:
- New York, NY : Teachers College Press, [2015]
- Summary:
- In her new book, bestselling author Mercedes Schneider provides little-known details about the history of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). She lifts the veil on the development of the Common Core, the individuals present in the back room, the push to copyright it so that test-makers could profit, and the urgency for governors to sign commitments before the standards were even completed. CCSS is publicized as being a state-led, teacher-developed approach guaranteed to ensure that all students are college- and career-ready. By the end of this eye-opening book, readers will come to understand the CCSS and its attendant assessments as something very different. Common Core Dilemma will appeal to readers across the political spectrum who want to better understand the role of corporations, nonprofits, big donors with strings attached, and the federal government in exercising control in our schools. It is essential reading for courses on education and government, and education and special interests. Book jacket.
- Contents:
- 1 Gradually Leaving Education Behind: No Child Left Behind and Its Predecessors 6
- ESEA in 1965: Coleman Report in 1966 7
- ESEA in 1994: The Improving America's Schools Act 9
- Goals 2000 10
- No Child Left Behind (NCLB) 14
- 2 Achieve and Its "Common Core of Standards" Master Plan-Part One 20
- Achieve, Who's Your Daddy? Why, IBM CEO Louis Gerstner, Jr. 22
- Achieve: Forget "Clearinghouse"; Let's Evaluate 24
- 3 Achieve and Its "Common Core of Standards" Master Plan-Part Two 32
- 1999: The Year of Achieve-Promoted, National Accountability 32
- 2001: NAEP Looks Nice, So We Done Good 35
- American Diploma Project 35
- 2008: ADP Expands into CCSS 41
- 4 Playing in the Achieve Sandbox: Education Trust and Fordham Institute 46
- Kati Haycock and Her Education Trust 46
- Fordham Foundation/Institute 56
- 5 The "State-Led" Lock-In: The Common Core Memorandum of Understanding 68
- MOU Title and Purpose 72
- MOU Background 73
- MOU Benefits to the States 74
- MOU Process and Structure 76
- 6 The Invisible Architects and Visible PR Machine: Student Achievement Partners 95
- Jason Zimba (and Coleman Intertwined) 98
- David Coleman, CCSS "Architect" 103
- Susan Pimentel 108
- 7 America, "Stay the Course" (Don't Remove That Noose): The Common Core Surveys 114
- American Federation of Teachers (AFT)/Hart CCSS Survey 116
- National Education Association (NEA) CCSS Survey 117
- Stand for Children (SFC) Louisiana CCSS Survey 118
- Gates/Scholastic CCSS Survey "Early Release" 121
- National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) CCSS Survey(s) 124
- CCSS: Signed, Sealed, and Delivered 126
- 8 NGA and CCSSO: Leal Owners of Common Core 128
- Defining Key Terms 131
- NCTM and NCTE 132
- CCSS Public License 133
- NGA and CCSSO: Serving Themselves and Profit-Driven Companies 138
- 9 Bill Gates Likes the Idea 140
- 10 Arne Wants In: Common Core and Race to the Top 160
- 11 Those "Powerful Market Forces": Pearson Wins 175
- A Century and a Half of Pearson 176
- The Pearson-Common Core Engagement 178
- Pearson: "We're Big, So Quality Becomes Irrelevant" 179
- Pearson and Common Core: Indispensability Is the Key 183
- Pearson: Tailor-Made for Those Powerful Market Forces 189.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 9780807756492
- 0807756490
- 9780807756508
- 0807756504
- OCLC:
- 904183213
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.