My Account Log in

1 option

The positive case for negative campaigning / Kyle Mattes and David P. Redlawsk.

LIBRA JK2281 .M388 2014
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Mattes, Kyle, author.
Redlawsk, David P., author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Political campaigns--United States.
Political campaigns.
United States.
Mass media--Political aspects--United States.
Mass media.
Mass media--Political aspects.
Campaign literature--United States.
Campaign literature.
Negativism.
Physical Description:
xi, 257 pages ; 23 cm
Place of Publication:
Chicago ; London : The University of Chicago Press, 2014.
Summary:
Turn on the television or sign in to social media during election season and chances are you'll see plenty of negative campaigning. For decades, conventional wisdom has held that Americans hate negativity in political advertising, and some have even argued that its pervasiveness in recent seasons has helped to drive down voter turnout. Arguing against this commonly held view, Kyle Mattes and David P. Redlawsk show not only that some negativity is accepted by voters as part of the political process, but that negative advertising is necessary to convey valuable information that would not otherwise be revealed. The most comprehensive treatment of negative campaigning to date, The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning uses models, surveys, and experiments to show that much of the seeming dislike of negative campaigning can be explained by the way survey questions have been worded. By failing to distinguish between baseless and credible attacks, surveys fail to capture differences in voters' receptivity. Voters' responses, the authors argue, vary greatly and can be better explained by the content and believability of the ads than by whether the ads are negative. Mattes and Redlawsk continue on to establish how voters make use of negative information and why it is necessary. Many voters are politically naïve and unlikely to make inferences about candidates' positions or traits, so the ability of candidates to go on the attack and focus explicitly on information that would not otherwise be available is crucial to voter education. Book jacket.
Contents:
Voters and negativity, and why the media can't help / with Stefan Mancevski
What do voters think? social desirability and attitudes about negativity
Examining voter response to real campaign ads
Modeling negativity
That ad said what? the importance of ad credibility
How the possibility of lies damages voter confidence in negativity.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9780226202020
022620202X
9780226202167
022620216X
OCLC:
880521066

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account