1 option
Continuations and natural language / Chris Barker, Chung-chieh Shan.
Van Pelt Library QA76.9.N38 B37 2014
By Request
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Barker, Chris, 1961- author.
- Shan, Chung-Chieh, author.
- Series:
- Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics ; 53.
- Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics ; 53
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Natural language processing (Computer science).
- Computational linguistics.
- Physical Description:
- xix, 228 pages ; 24 cm.
- Place of Publication:
- Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014.
- Summary:
- This book takes concepts developed by researchers in theoretical computer science and adapts and applies them to the study of natural language meaning. Summarizing more than a decade of research, Chris Barker and Chung-chieh Shan put forward the Continuation Hypothesis: that the meaning of a natural language expression can depend on its own continuation. In Part I, the authors develop a continuation-based theory of scope and quantificational binding and provide an explanation for order sensitivity in scope-related phenomena such as scope ambiguity, crossover, superiority, reconstruction, negative polarity licensing, dynamic anaphora, and donkey anaphora. Part II outlines an innovative substructural logic for reasoning about continuations and proposes an analysis of the compositional semantics of adjectives such as 'same' in terms of parasitic and recursive scope. It also shows that certain cases of ellipsis should be treated as anaphora to a continuation, leading to a new explanation for a subtype of sluicing known as sprouting. The book makes a significant contribution to work on scope, reference, quantification, and other central aspects of semantics and will appeal to semanticists in linguistics and philosophy at graduate level and above. Book jacket.
- Contents:
- Part I Towers: Scope and Evaluation Order
- 1 Scope and towers 3
- 1.1 Scope 3
- 1.2 Syntactic categories: adjacency vs. containment 4
- 1.3 Tower notation 6
- 1.4 The combination schema 7
- 1.5 Types and continuations 9
- 1.6 The LIFT type-shifter 10
- 1.7 The LOWER type-shifter 11
- 1.8 A linear scope bias 13
- 1.9 A scope ambiguity due to LOWER 13
- 2 Binding and crossover 15
- 2.1 The irrelevance of c-command 17
- 2.2 The standard approach to crossover 18
- 2.3 A first crossover example 19
- 2.4 Strong crossover 20
- 2.5 Reversing the order of evaluation 20
- 2.6 Default evaluation order is left-to-right 22
- 3 From generalized quantifiers to dynamic meaning 24
- 3.1 Capturing the duality of DP meaning 24
- 3.2 Deriving context update functions 26
- 3.3 Comparison with Dynamic Montague Grammar 27
- 3.4 Unification of generalized quantifiers with dynamic semantics 29
- 4 Multi-level towers: Inverse scope 30
- 4.1 Accounting for scope ambiguity 30
- 4.2 Binding without indices: variable-free semantics 34
- 4.3 The role of LOWER in the explanation for crossover 35
- 5 Movement as delayed evaluation: Wh-fronting 38
- 5.1 Simple relative clauses: gaps 38
- 5.2 From in-situ wh to ex-situ wh: FRONT 40
- 5.3 Pied piping 42
- 5.4 Preview of delayed evaluation 44
- 5.5 Multiple wh-questions, and an account of superiority 44
- 6 Reconstruction effects 48
- 6.1 Reconstructing quantificational binding in a question 49
- 6.2 Despite reconstruction, crossover effects remain in force 52
- 6.3 Principle C effects are not expected 53
- 6.4 Reconstruction into relative clauses 54
- 6.5 Relative pronouns with pied piping 55
- 6.6 Idioms 56
- 6.7 Reflexives and each other anaphors 57
- 6.8 Conclusions concerning reconstruction 59
- 7 Generalized coordination, Flexible Montague Grammar 61
- 7.1 Generalized coordination as re-executing a continuation 61
- 7.2 Flexible Montague Grammar: implicit continuations 64
- 7.3 Argument Raising 64
- 7.4 Value Raising 66
- 7.5 So how flexible is Flexible Montague Grammar? 68
- 7.6 Adding binding to Flexible Montague Grammar 70
- 8 Order effects in negative polarity licensing 72
- 8.1 Negative polarity, order, and scope 73
- 8.2 An evaluation-order account 75
- 8.3 Other theories of order in NPI licensing 78
- 9 Donkey anaphora and donkey crossover 81
- 9.1 Donkey anaphora as in-scope binding 82
- 9.2 Why does every disrupt donkey anaphora? 86
- 9.3 Multiple indefinites: tracking bishops 86
- 9.4 Conjoined antecedents 89
- 9.5 Disjoined antecedents 91
- 9.6 Indefinites with universal force in the consequent 92
- 9.7 Donkey weak crossover 94
- 9.8 Conclusions 95
- 10 Strategies for determiners 97
- 10.1 Donkey anaphora from relative clauses 97
- 10.2 A derivation on which the indefinite scopes too low 99
- 10.3 A derivation on which the indefinite scopes too high 100
- 10.4 Explicitly managing side effects 101
- 10.5 Crossover for relative clause donkey anaphora 102
- 10.6 A scope-roofing constraint 102
- 10.7 A mystery concerning scope islands for universals 105
- 11 Other combinatory categorial frameworks 107
- 11.1 Jacobson's Variable-Free program 107
- 11.2 lacobson's lgz fragment 108
- 11.3 Steedman's scope as surface constituency 110
- 12 Computational connections 113
- 12.1 Order of evaluation in the lambda calculus 113
- 12.2 Notes on a computational implementation 117
- Part II Logic: Same and Sluicing
- 13 NL<sub>λ</sub> 125
- 13.1 Categories 125
- 13.2 Structures 126
- 13.3 Logical rules 126
- 13.4 Proofs as derivations 128
- 13.5 Structures with holes (contexts) 128
- 13.6 Curry-Howard labeling (semantic interpretation) 130
- 13.7 Quantifier scope ambiguity 131
- 14 Parasitic scope for same 133
- 14.1 Motivating a scope-taking analysis for same 134
- 14.2 Parasitic scope 135
- 14.3 Pervasive scope-taking 137
- 14.4 Same in the presence of partitives: recursive scope 138
- 14.5 Other accounts of same 139
- 15 Scope versus discontinuity: Anaphora, VPE 141
- 15.1 The tangram picture of parasitic scope 141
- 15.2 Discontinuous Lambek Grammar 142
- 15.3 Pronominal binding as parasitic scope 143
- 15.4 Verb phrase ellipsis as parasitic scope 145
- 15.5 Other parasitic scope analyses 146
- 16 Sluicing as anaphora to a continuation 147
- 16.1 Other approaches 147
- 16.2 Basic sluicing 148
- 16.3 Immediate good prediction: scope of inner antecedent 149
- 16.4 Case matching 150
- 16.5 Simple sprouting 151
- 16.6 Embedded sprouting: motivating silent modifiers 152
- 16.7 Sprouting in silence 153
- 16.8 Implicit argument sluices 155
- 16.9 A recursive scope analysis of Andrews Amalgams 157
- 16.10 Semantic restrictions on sluicing: the Answer Ban 159
- 17 Formal properties of NL<sub>λ</sub> 162
- 17.1 Scope-taking in type-logical grammars 163
- 17.2 NLCL: An equivalent logic with standard postulates 164
- 17.3 Soundness and completeness 167
- 17.4 NLCL is conservative over NL 168
- 17.5 The connection between NL<sub>λ</sub> and NL<sub>CL</sub> 170
- 17.6 Embedding NL<sub>λ</sub> into NL<sub>CL</sub> 171
- 17.7 Embedding NL<sub>CL</sub>CL into NL<sub>λ</sub> 177
- 17.8 Cut elimination 179
- 17.9 Decidability 181
- 17.10 Proof search with gaps 185
- 17.11 Sluicing and unrestricted abstraction 186
- 18 Scope needs delimited continuations 188
- 18.1 The λμ-calculus applied to scope 190
- 18.2 The Lambek-Grishin calculus and scope 193
- 18.3 A continuation-based grammar for dynamic semantics 197
- 18.4 Monads 198.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 9780199575015
- 0199575010
- 9780199575022
- 0199575029
- OCLC:
- 904268163
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.