1 option
The dyslexia debate / Julian G. Elliott, Durham University, Elena L. Grigorenko, Yale University.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Elliott, Julian, 1955- author.
- Grigorenko, Elena L., author.
- Series:
- Cambridge studies in cognitive perceptual development ; 14.
- Cambridge studies in cognitive perceptual development
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Dyslexia.
- Dyslexia--Diagnosis.
- Dyslexia--diagnosis.
- Child Development.
- Psychology, Child.
- Medical Subjects:
- Dyslexia--diagnosis.
- Child Development.
- Psychology, Child.
- Physical Description:
- xvii, 271 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm.
- Place of Publication:
- New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2014.
- Summary:
- "The Dyslexia Debate examines how we use the term "dyslexia" and questions its efficacy as a diagnosis. While many believe that a diagnosis of dyslexia will shed light on a reader's struggles and help identify the best form of intervention, Julian G. Elliott and Elena L. Grigorenko show that it adds little value. In fact, our problematic interpretation of the term could prove to be a major disservice to many children with difficulties learning to read. This book outlines in detail the diverse ways in which reading problems have been conceptualized and operationalized. Elliott and Grigorenko consider the latest research in cognitive science, genetics, and neuroscience, and the limitations of these fields in terms of professional action. They then provide a more helpful, scientifically rigorous way to describe the various types of reading difficulties and discuss empirically supported forms of intervention"--Provided by publisher.
- Contents:
- What is dyslexia?
- Explanations at the cognitive level
- The neurobiological bases of reading and reading disability
- Assessment and intervention
- Conclusions and recommendations.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 183-258) and index.
- ISBN:
- 9780521119863
- 0521119863
- 9780521135870
- 0521135877
- OCLC:
- 857980233
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.