1 option
Redirecting innovation in U.S. health care : options to decrease spending and increase value / Steven Garber [and six others].
Van Pelt Library RA410.53 .G36 2014
Available
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Garber, Steven, 1950- author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Medical care, Cost of--United States.
- Medical care, Cost of.
- Medical technology.
- Cost effectiveness.
- Medical care--Technological innovations.
- Medical care.
- United States.
- Medical care--Technological innovations--United States--Cost effectiveness.
- Medical technology--United States--Cost effectiveness.
- Drug approval--United States.
- Drug approval.
- Medicare.
- Physical Description:
- xxvii, 105 pages : color illustrations ; 26 cm
- Other Title:
- Redirecting innovation in United States health care
- Place of Publication:
- Santa Monica, CA : Rand Corporation, [2014]
- Summary:
- New medical technologies are a leading driver of U.S. health care spending. This report identifies promising policy options to change which medical technologies are created, with two related policy goals: (1) Reduce total health care spending with the smallest possible loss of health benefits, and (2) ensure that new medical products that increase spending are accompanied by health benefits that are worth the spending increases. The analysis synthesized information from peer-reviewed and other literature, a panel of technical advisors convened for the project, and 50 one-on-one expert interviews. The authors also conducted case studies of eight medical products. The following features of the U.S. health care environment tend to increase spending without also conferring major health benefits: lack of basic scientific knowledge about some disease processes, costs and risks of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, limited rewards for medical products that could lower spending, treatment creep, and the medical arms race. The authors identified ten policy options that would help advance the two policy goals. Five would do so by reducing the costs and/or risks of invention and obtaining FDA approval: (1) Enable more creativity in funding basic science, (2) offer prizes for inventions, (3) buy out patents, (4) establish a public-interest investment fund, and (5) expedite FDA reviews and approvals. The other five options would do so by increasing market rewards for products: (1) Reform Medicare payment policies, (2) reform Medicare coverage policies, (3) coordinate FDA approval and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services coverage processes, (4) increase demand for technologies that decrease spending, and (5) produce more and more-timely technology assessments. Book jacket.
- Contents:
- Chapter 1 Introduction 1
- Project Goals 3
- What Determines Value for Health Care Products? 4
- Chapter 2 The Context for Medical Product Innovation 7
- Three Stages of Innovation 7
- Primary Actors in Inventing Medical Products 9
- Drug and Device Companies 9
- HIT Companies 11
- Goals of Medical Product Inventors 11
- Private Investors 11
- Financial Incentives of Medical Product Inventors 12
- Influencers of Medical Product Invention 13
- National Institutes of Health 14
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration 14
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 15
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Techno logy 15
- Primary Actor and Influencers in Approval of Medical Technologies 15
- Primary Actors in Adoption of Medical Products 16
- Physicians 16
- Hospitals 17
- Influencers of Providers 18
- Summary: Context for Medical Product Innovation 20
- Chapter 3 Methods 21
- Literature Reviews 21
- Technical Expert Panel 22
- Expert Interviews 24
- Case Studies 25
- Policy Options 27
- Chapter 4 Analysis 29
- Lack of Basic Scientific Knowledge 30
- Lack of an Adequate Knowledge Base Can Hinder Product Inventors 30
- Sources of Financial Support for Increasing Basic Scientific Knowledge 31
- Federal Funding Is Critical to Expanding the Basic Scientific Base 31
- Case Study Summary. Haemophilus influenzae Type b (Hib) Vaccine 32
- How Scientific Uncertainty Affects Medical Produce Invention 34
- Costs and Risks of FDA Approval 34
- Could the FDA Ensure Safety with Quicker and Less Costly Processes? 34
- Delays Entail Both Health and Financial Costs 35
- Case Study Summary: A Cardiovascular Polypill 35
- Unpredictability and Ineffective Communication Complicate the Approval Process 37
- FDA Caution May Be a Root Cause of Regulatory Delay 38
- Case Study Summary: Avastin for Metastatic Breast Cancer 39
- Regulatory Risk Figures Prominently in Investment and Invention Decisions 41
- Flow Regulators Uncertainty Affects Investment and Invention 41
- Limited Rewards for Medical Products That Could Lower Spending 42
- Many Patients and Providers Are Fairly Insensitive to Prices 43
- Generous Health Insurance Tends to Reduce Consumers' Sensitivity to Price 43
- Fee-for-Service Payment Also Tends to Reduce Price Sensitivity 45
- Lack of Price Transparency Also Reduces Price Sensitivity 45
- Medicare Is Not Allowed to Consider Costs in Coverage and Reimbursement Decisions 45
- Limited Time Elorizons and Fragmented Decisionmaking 46
- Case Study Summary: Electronic Health Records 47
- Inadequate Rewards for Products That Decrease Spending 51
- Implications for Inventors and Investors 51
- Treatment Creep 52
- Case Study Summary: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator 52
- Manufacturers Can Promote Low-Value Use 55
- Case Study Summary: Prostate-Specific Antigen 56
- Defensive Medicine Is a Form of Treatment Creep 58
- Off-Label Use of Medical Products Is Widespread, but Health Effects Are Unknown 58
- It Is Difficult to Control Undesirable Instances of Off-Label Use 58
- Treatment Creep Can Substantially Affect Incentives for innovators 60
- Medical Arms Race 60
- The Classical Medical Arms Race 60
- The New Medical Arms Race 61
- Expensive and Controversial Medical Equipment Remains Prominent 61
- Case Study Summary: Robotic Surgery 62
- What Drives the Medical Arms Race? 64
- The Medical Arms Race Can Substantially Affect Incentives of Inventors 64
- Chapter 5 Policy Options to Improve the U.S. Medical Product Innovation System 65
- Options to Reduce Costs and Risks of Invention and Approval 67
- Enable More Creativity in Funding Basic Science 67
- Offer Prizes for Inventions 68
- Buy Out Selected Patents 69
- Establish a Public-Interest Investment Fund 70
- Expedite FDA Reviews and Approvals for Products That Decrease Spending 70
- Implementation Challenges 71
- Options to Increase Market Rewards 71
- Reform Medicare Payment Policies 72
- Reform Medicare Coverage Policies 73
- Coordinate FDA Approval and CMS Coverage Processes 74
- Increase Demand for Products That Could Decrease Spending 75
- Produce More and More-Timely Technology Assessments 76
- Case Study Summary: Telemedicine 76
- Summary 79
- Chapter 6 In Conclusion 81.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 91-105).
- "RR-308"--Page [4] of cover.
- ISBN:
- 0833085468
- 9780833085467
- OCLC:
- 878024393
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.