Genealogies of peace: Hostility, consensus, and war in comparative political thought.

Format:

Book

Thesis/Dissertation

Author/Creator:

Idris, Murad, 1984-

Contributor:

Green, Jeffrey, committee member.

Lowry, Joseph, committee member.

Hirschmann, Nancy, committee member.

Norton, Anne, advisor.

University of Pennsylvania. Political Science.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Political science.

Political Science, General.

0615.

Penn dissertations--Political science.

Political science--Penn dissertations.

Local Subjects:

Political Science, General.

Penn dissertations--Political science.

Political science--Penn dissertations.

0615.

Physical Description:

639 pages

Contained In:

Dissertation Abstracts International 74-02A(E).

System Details:

Mode of access: World Wide Web.

text file

Summary:

This dissertation is a genealogy of the concept of "peace," its moralities, and its disseminations. Although peace is touted today as a universal ideal or neutral description, I approach it as a historical and cultural artifact, arguing that through canonical texts of political theory to contemporary discourses, its meaning is constituted through antagonisms, polemics, and exclusions.

This project makes the three overarching claims that the structures of peace are polemical, provincial, and parasitical . First, peace has been fashioned for and honed against specific others, used to facilitate hostility, and elaborated as a filter for historically specific animosities. Second, universalized notions of peace are grounded in claims about 'the world' that reflect historically specific and particular interests, fears, and desires, as well as theories about humanity's relationship to war and peace. Finally, peace has attained its meaning through constellations of ideals that are insinuated into it. Rather than strengthening it, these 'insinuates of peace' increase its potential for self-subversion and limit its possibilities. Corresponding to these three claims, this project highlights repressed alternatives, namely an ethic of sparing and letting be, peace as a particular relation, and a reconceptualization of the truce.

Chapter 1 surveys contemporary discussions and deployments of peace, and argues that its structures are polemical, provincial, and parasitical. Chapters 2–6 analyze the disseminations and reconfigurations of these structures through canonical works of political theory, linked through chains of citation, including Plato's Laws (Chapter 2), the writings of al-Farabi and Aquinas (Chapter 3), Erasmus (Chapter 4), Grotius and Gentili (Chapter 5), and Kant and Sayyid Qut&dotbelow;b (Chapter 6). Chapters 7 and 8 locate these structures in contemporary and historical discourses about Islam and peace. Both European and Arabic sources are examined, including attempts to define Islam in relation to peace, war, Christianity, God, liberalism, and colonialism. The final chapter turns to Ibn T&dotbelow;ufayl's H&dotbelow;ayy ibn Yaqz&dotbelow;an for the alternate forms of ethical conduct that it portrays. As a whole, these chapters argue that the lineages, effects, and uses of peace as a concept demand that we rethink the status of "peace" as a universal ideal.

Notes:

Thesis (Ph.D. in Political Science) -- University of Pennsylvania, 2012.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02(E), Section: A.

Adviser: Anne Norton.

Local Notes:

School code: 0175.

ISBN:

9781267712868

Access Restriction:

Restricted for use by site license.