1 option
The use of standardized scores in officer career management and selection / Anny Wong ... [and others].
- Format:
- Book
- Series:
- Technical report (Rand Corporation)
- Technical report
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Psychological tests.
- Armed Forces.
- Management.
- United States--Armed Forces--Officers--Selection and appointment.
- United States.
- United States--Armed Forces--Officers--Management.
- Educational tests and measurements--United States.
- Educational tests and measurements.
- Psychological tests--United States.
- Physical Description:
- xv, 73 pages ; 28 cm.
- Place of Publication:
- Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2012.
- Contents:
- Study scope and research method
- Organization of the report
- Use of standardized tests
- What is a standardized test?
- What makes a good standardized test?
- Reliability
- Validity
- Racial/ethnic group differences, bias, and adverse impact
- Racial/ethnic differences
- Bias
- Adverse impact
- Standardized tests are generally used as part of a selection system
- Current use of standardized tests in the armed forces
- Current practices in standardized testing
- Conceptual framework
- Selection into officer commissioning programs
- ROTC
- OCS/OTS
- Service academies
- Branch, specialty, job selection
- Commissioning
- Promotion
- Conclusion
- Appendix A. Standardized tests used by the Armed Forces
- B. Questions for services
- Bibliography
- Figures
- Figure 3.1 Standardized tests and major selection points
- Tables
- Table 3.1 tests for ROTC applicants
- Table 3.2 Tests for OCS/OTS applicants
- Table 3.3 Tests for service academy applicants
- Table 3.4 tests and branch/specialty/job selection at ROTC
- Table 3.5 Tests and branch/specialty/job selection at OCS/OTS
- Table 3.6 Tests and branch/specialty/job selection at service academies.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references.
- ISBN:
- 9780833059024
- 0833059025
- OCLC:
- 778828075
- Online:
- http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2012/RAND_TR952.pdf
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.