My Account Log in

1 option

Living with a reluctant hegemon : explaining European responses to US unilateralism / Caroline Fehl.

Van Pelt Library JZ1480.A54 F44 2012
Loading location information...

By Request Item cannot be checked out at the library but can be requested.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Thesis/Dissertation
Author/Creator:
Fehl, Caroline.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Hegemony--United States.
Hegemony.
International relations.
Public opinion.
United States.
United States--Foreign relations--Europe--Public opinion.
Europe--Foreign relations--United States.
Europe.
United States--Foreign relations--2001-2009.
United States--Foreign relations--2009-.
Europe--Relations--United States.
Relations.
United States--Relations--Europe.
Genre:
Academic theses.
Physical Description:
xiii, 254 pages ; 25 cm
Place of Publication:
Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2012.
Summary:
Living with a Reluctant Hegemon addresses a striking puzzle in contemporary world politics: why have European states responded in varying ways to recent unilateralist tendencies in US foreign policy? The United States played a hegemonic leadership role in building the post-war multilateral order, but has been reluctant to embrace many recent multilateral treaty initiatives championed by its traditional European allies, such as the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, the International Criminal Court, or the verification protocol to the Biological Weapons Convention. European responses to US objections, however, have varied widely across these different transatlantic controversies. In some cases, European decision-makers watered down or abandoned contested treaties, whereas in other disputes, they opted for regime-building excluding the US, that is, for a strategy of non-hegemonic cooperation.
How Europeans choose to deal with the 'reluctant hegemon' has critical implications for how key global challenges are addressed, and yet, the striking variation of their responses has been largely overlooked in a scholarly debate fixated on understanding US unilateralism. The book fills this important gap by studying European strategic choices in five recent transatlantic conflicts over multilateral agreements. It argues that neither realist accounts of global power dynamics, nor rational institutionalist models of cooperation can fully explain why Europeans opt for non-hegemonic cooperation in some cases but not others. To resolve this puzzle, we need to combine rationalist propositions with constructivist insights about normative constraints on states' institutional choices. By developing such an integrated model, this book sheds new light on the long-standing theoretical debate about the relationship between hegemony and international cooperation. Book jacket.
Contents:
Introduction
The power puzzle
The argument
Case study : anti-personnel landmines
Case study : the International Criminal Court
Case study : the Kyoto Protocol on climate change
Case study : small arms and light weapons
Case study : biological weapons verification
Conclusion
Appendix I: Methodology
Appendix II: List of interviews.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Adapted from the author's thesis (Ph.D.)--Oxford University, 2009.
ISBN:
9780199608621
0199608628
OCLC:
777373882

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account