1 option
Allocating federal funds for state programs for English language learners / Panel to Review Alternative Data Sources for the Limited-English Proficiency Allocation Formula under Title III, Part A, Elementary and Secondary Education Act ; Committee on National Statistics and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council of the National Academies.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- National Research Council (U.S.). Panel to Review Alternative Data Sources for the Limited-English Proficiency Allocation Formula under Title III, Part A, Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Education--United States--States--Finance.
- Education.
- United States.
- Finance.
- Federal aid to education--United States.
- Federal aid to education.
- English language--Study and teaching--United States--Foreign speakers.
- English language.
- English language--Study and teaching.
- United States. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
- American community survey.
- Physical Description:
- xxii, 213 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm
- Place of Publication:
- Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, [2011]
- Summary:
- As the United States continues to be a nation of immigrants and their children, the nation's school systems face increased enrollments of students whose primary language is not English. With the 2001 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) in the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), the allocation of federal funds for programs to assist these students to be proficient in English became formula-based: 80 percent on the basis of the population of children with limited English proficiency and 20 percent on the basis of the population of recently immigrated children and youth. Title III of NCLB directs the U.S. Department of Education to allocate funds on the basis of the more accurate of two allowable data sources: the number of students reported to the federal government by each state education agency or data from the American Community Survey (ACS). The department determined that the ACS estimates are more accurate, and since 2005, those data have been basis for the federal distribution of Title III funds. Subsequently, analyses of the two data sources have raised concerns about that decision, especially because the two allowable data sources would allocate quite different amounts to the states. In addition, while shortcomings were noted in the data provided by the states, the ACS estimates were shown to fluctuate between years, causing concern among the states about the unpredictability and unevenness of program funding. In this context, the U.S. Department of Education commissioned the National Research Council to address the accuracy of the estimates from the two data sources and the factors that influence the estimates. The resulting book also considers means of increasing the accuracy of the data sources or alternative data sources that could be used for allocation purposes.
- Contents:
- 1 Introduction 5
- The Population and the New Landscape 5
- Allocating Funds for Title III Programs 8
- Review by the U.S. Government Accountability Office 13
- This Study and This Report 15
- 2 American Community Survey Estimates 21
- The American Community Survey 21
- Assessment of the Data 29
- ACS Estimates 36
- Properties of the Estimates 37
- 3 Quality and Comparability of State Tests of English Language Proficiency 59
- NCLB Requirements for English Language Proficiency Tests 60
- State English Language Proficiency Tests 61
- General Similarities and Differences Among the State Tests 67
- 4 State Procedures for Identifying and Classifying English Language Learners 77
- Initial Classification of Students 80
- Reclassification of ELL Students 86
- Data on ELL Students Reported to the Federal Government 90
- 5 Comparison of American Community Survey Estimates and State Counts 103
- Conceptual Differences in the Two Sources 103
- Comparison of Shares of ELL Students 105
- Comparison of Rates of ELL Students 111
- Understanding the Differences 116
- 6 Comparability of Estimates of Immigrant School-Age Children 133
- ACS Data and Estimates 134
- State Procedures for Determining Immigrant Status 145
- Comparison of ACS and State Estimates 150
- 7 Decision Criteria and Recommendations 161
- Desired Characteristics of Allocation Formulas 161
- Comparing the Allowable Data Sources 164.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 171-179).
- ISBN:
- 0309186587
- 9780309186582
- OCLC:
- 705518864
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.