2 options
Shooting the principal while embracing the agent: Why process matters when delivering bad outcomes.
- Format:
- Book
- Thesis/Dissertation
- Author/Creator:
- Hogan, Susan Kathryn.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Oral communication.
- Communication.
- Social psychology.
- Marketing.
- 0338.
- 0451.
- 0459.
- Penn dissertations--Marketing.
- Marketing--Penn dissertations.
- Penn dissertations--Managerial science and applied economics.
- Managerial science and applied economics--Penn dissertations.
- Local Subjects:
- Penn dissertations--Marketing.
- Marketing--Penn dissertations.
- Penn dissertations--Managerial science and applied economics.
- Managerial science and applied economics--Penn dissertations.
- 0338.
- 0451.
- 0459.
- Physical Description:
- 106 pages
- Contained In:
- Dissertation Abstracts International 63-02A.
- System Details:
- Mode of access: World Wide Web.
- text file
- Summary:
- In two experiments I examined the process by which non-critical bad news communicated through an agent influences respondents' evaluations toward both the agent and the principal. Respondents rated both agents and principals most favorably when the agent adopted a forthcoming delivery style while delivering bad news. However, when the agent accepted personal responsibility for a bad news outcome, respondents formed separate evaluations for the principal and the agent, leading to a potential conflict of interest between agent and principal. Specifically, respondents' evaluations for the principal were most favorable when the agent passed off responsibility for the problem to the client's employee rather than accepting personal responsibility. However, the agent derived the highest evaluations by personally accepting responsibility for bad news. When respondents anticipated that they would be held accountable for their evaluations, this principal-agent conflict disappeared. That is, in conditions in which respondents perceived they would be expected to later justify their evaluations, both the principal and agent received the highest evaluations when the agent passed responsibility for the bad news to the client's employee. This suggests that accountability moderates an individual's evaluative responses and in so doing, eliminates the principal-agent conflict.
- Notes:
- Thesis (Ph.D. in Marketing) -- University of Pennsylvania, 2002.
- Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-02, Section: A, page: 0674.
- Advisers: Stephen J. Hoch; Mary Frances Luce.
- Local Notes:
- School code: 0175.
- ISBN:
- 9780493577852
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.