My Account Log in

1 option

Worst case bioethics : death, disaster, and public health / George J. Annas.

Holman Biotech Commons R724 .A67 2010
Loading location information...

Available This item is available for access.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Annas, George J.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Medical ethics--United States.
Medical ethics.
United States.
Medical care--United States.
Medical care.
Public health--United States.
Public health.
Medical policy--United States.
Medical policy.
Bioethics.
Attitude to Death.
Disasters.
Health Policy.
Human Rights.
Jurisprudence.
Medical Subjects:
Bioethics.
United States.
Attitude to Death.
Disasters.
Health Policy.
Human Rights.
Jurisprudence.
Physical Description:
xxiv, 335 pages ; 25 cm
Place of Publication:
New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.
Summary:
Bioethics, still in its infancy, is routinely called on by the government to provide political cover for controversial public health decisions involving the life and death of Americans. Doomsday or worst-case scenarios are often at the heart of these biopolitical decisions. A central feature of science fiction, these scenarios can impart useful insights. But worst-case scenarios, like Frankenstein's monster, can also be unpredictably destructive, undermining both preparedness and the very values bioethics seeks to promote. Discovering a new flu strain, for example, leads immediately to visions of the 1918 flu pandemic, the worst in human history. Likewise, a "ticking time bomb" scenario leads to the use of the "saving lives" rationale that permits lawyers to justify it and physicians to carry it out. The worst case charge of "death panels" continues to threaten meaningful healthcare reform in the US. Fundamental change in American healthcare, Annas argues, will require fundamental change in American, including confronting our obsession with technology and our denial of death, and replacing our over-reliance on the military and market metaphors in medicine. "A combination of the ecological and rights metaphors could help us successfully navigate the waters of change." In Worst Case Bioethics, George Annas employs contemporary disputes involving death and disaster to explore the radical changes underway in public health practice, the application of constitutional law to medicine, and human rights discourse to promote human health and wellbeing. Worst-case scenarios, especially worst-case bioethics scenarios, distort debate, limit options, rationalize human rights abuses, and undermine equality and social justice. It is, nonetheless, possible to temper worst-case scenarios in ways that promote both the development of a meaningful American bioethics, and a life and liberty affirming global health and human rights movement. Written at the intersection of law, bioethics, public health, and human rights, Worst Case Bioethics will interest not only bioethicists but scholars in public health, public policy, and human rights law, as well as members of the public who want to participate in these policy debates.
Contents:
American healthcare
Bioterror and bioart
State of emergency
Licensed to torture
Hunger strikes
War
Cancer
Drug dealing
Toxic tinkering
Abortion
Culture of death
Patient safety
Global health
Statue of security
Pandemic fear
Bioidentifiers
Genetic genocide.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9780195391732
019539173X
OCLC:
428770802

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account