2 options
Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey / James A. Davis, Tom W. Smith, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Judith Treas.
- Format:
- Datafile
- Series:
- ICPSR (Series) ; 9593.
- ICPSR ; 9593
- General Social Survey Series ; 9593
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Occupational prestige--United States.
- Occupational prestige.
- Social surveys--United States.
- Social surveys.
- United States.
- Genre:
- Academic theses.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource.
- Place of Publication:
- Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1992.
- System Details:
- Mode of access: World Wide Web.
- data file
- Summary:
- This data collection contains the prestige ratings that respondents to the 1989 General Social Survey assigned to various occupations. The purpose of the collection was to replicate the benchmark study of occupational prestige conducted by Hodge, Siegel, and Rossi (HSR) in 1964, while expanding the number of rated occupations to include all 503 detailed occupational categories in the 1980 Census. Additional titles were added from the HSR study and several other studies of occupational prestige, for a total of 704 occupational titles. Respondents were divided into 10 subsamples, with each subsample rating 110 occupations. The first 40 titles presented to each respondent were the same for all subsamples. As in the HSR study, respondents were asked to rate the occupations on a scale of 1 to 9. To promote comparability with the HSR study, both the nature of the task respondents were asked to perform (ranking titles) and the wording of the instructions were the same in both studies.... Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09593
- Contents:
- Part 1: Raw Ratings Data; Part 2: Prestige Scores for All Detailed Occupations
- Notes:
- Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2004-10-30.
- OCLC:
- 61163093
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.