2 options
International Comparative Study on the Management, Productivity, and Effectiveness of Research Teams and Institutions (ICSOPRU), 1971-1989 / United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Access to some datasets may require login with free personal MyData account. Connect to resource Available online
View online- Format:
- Datafile
- Series:
- ICPSR (Series) ; 9471.
- ICPSR ; 9471
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Research--Evaluation.
- Research.
- Research teams--Evaluation.
- Research teams.
- Research institutes--Evaluation.
- Research institutes.
- Genre:
- Academic theses.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource.
- Place of Publication:
- Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1991.
- System Details:
- Mode of access: World Wide Web.
- data file
- Summary:
- The goal of the ICSOPRU project was to improve the management of research teams and institutions and increase awareness of their responsibility concerning proper application of research results. Concrete objectives were twofold: (1) on the international level, to make widely available comparable facts and experiences concerning the management of research teams and to promote multilateral as well as bilateral cooperation in this field, and (2) on the national level to provide all those concerned (science policy-makers, research managers, scientists, engineers) with substantive information on the state of their national research potential and to encourage them, on the basis of this information compared eventually with similar information from other countries, to take self-corrective actions as needed to improve the level of effectiveness and productivity of the research teams and institutions. Seventeen countries from Africa, the Arab States, Asia, Europe and Latin America took part in ICSOPRU. There were four stages or rounds of data collection: six countries (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Hungary, Poland, Sweden) in Round 1 (between February and September 1974), six countries (Argentina, Egypt, India, Republic of Korea [South], Poland, Ukrainian S.S.R.) in Round 2 (between June 1978 and September 1981), five countries (Brazil, India, Nigeria, Spain, Ukrainian S.S.R.) in Round 3 (between October 1981 and November 1985), and four countries (China, Ghana, Hungary, Mexico) in Round 4 (between May 1985 and June 1987). Each round of questionnaires had different items (except for Rounds 2 and 3 which were the same). Round 1 items included general administrative information relevant to the research units answered by the administrator of the unit, scientific information on the research unit and information relevant to the unit's head answered by the hea... Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09471
- Contents:
- Part 1: Round 1, Form RU Questionnaire Data; Part 2: Round 1, Form SA Questionnaire Data; Part 3: Round 1, Form SB Questionnaire Data; Part 4: Round 1, Form TS Questionnaire Data; Part 5: Round 1, Form EV Questionnaire Data; Part 6: Round 1, Form EE Questionnaire Data; Part 7: Round 1, Unit-Level Statistics Calculated by Country; Part 8: Round 1, Unit-Level Statistics Calculated by Type of Institution; Part 9: Round 1, Unit-Level Statistics Calculated by Field of Science; Part 10: Round 1, All Respondent-Level Statistics; Part 11: Round 2, Form RU Questionnaire Data; Part 12: Round 2, Form CM Questionnaire Data; Part 13: Round 2, Form EV Questionnaire Data; Part 14: Round 2, Form EE Questionnaire Data; Part 15: Round 2, Unit-Level Statistics Calculated by Country; Part 16: Round 2, Unit-Level Statistics Calculated by Type of Institution; Part 17: Round 2, Unit-Level Statistics Calculated by Field of Science; Part 18: Round 2, All Respondent-Level Statistics; Part 19: Round 3, F...
- Notes:
- Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2004-10-30.
- Start: 1971; and end: 1989.
- OCLC:
- 61162805
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.