2 options
NEW YORK TIMES New York City Poll #1, October 2001 / The New York Times.
Online
Available online
Access to some datasets may require login with free personal MyData account. Connect to resourceICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research) Available online
ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research)- Format:
- Datafile
- Series:
- ICPSR (Series) ; 3373.
- ICPSR ; 3373
- CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES POLL SERIES ; 3373
- Language:
- English
- Genre:
- Academic theses.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource.
- Edition:
- ICPSR version.
- Place of Publication:
- Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002.
- System Details:
- Mode of access: World Wide Web.
- data file
- Summary:
- This special topic poll was designed to assess respondents' interest in and opinions about the 2001 election campaign for New York City mayor as well as their opinions about and reactions to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Residents of New York City gave their opinions of President George W. Bush and Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and their handling of the terrorist attacks, along with their opinions of mayoral candidates Michael Bloomberg (Republican), Fernando Ferrer (Democrat), and Mark Green (Democrat), New York governor George Pataki, and New York senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Charles Schumer. Respondents were queried about their readiness to vote in the upcoming mayoral election, whom were they going to vote for, whether they would vote for Giuliani if he were a candidate, and whether Giuliani should leave office as scheduled, extend his current term by three months, or be permitted to run again. Their views were sought on life in New York City over the past four years, the most important problem facing the city, the New York City economy and how it had been affected by the terrorist attacks, the national image of the city and its residents' responses to the terrorist attacks, and whether respondents were concerned about another terrorist attack on the city. The survey assessed respondents' willingness to give up personal freedoms to make the country safe. Specifically, they were asked whether they would mind the following: arriving three hours early for a domestic flight, having more security checkpoints at public events/public buildings, allowing government agencies to monitor the telephone calls and e-mail of ordinary American citizens on a regular basis, and requiring everyone in the United States to carry a national electronic identification card. Respondents were asked about their reactions to the terrori... Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03373
- Contents:
- Part 1: Data File
- Notes:
- Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2004-10-30.
- OCLC:
- 61154189
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.