Impact Assessment of Sex Offender Notification on Wisconsin Communities, 1998 / Richard Zevitz, Mary Ann Farkas.

Format:

Datafile

Contributor:

Zevitz, Richard.

Farkas, Mary Ann.

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Series:

ICPSR (Series) ; 3015.

ICPSR ; 3015

Language:

English

Genre:

Academic theses.

Physical Description:

1 online resource.

Edition:

ICPSR Version, 2006-03-30.

Place of Publication:

Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2001.

System Details:

Mode of access: World Wide Web.

data file

Summary:

In response to widespread public concern about convicted sex offenders being returned from prison, federal and state laws have been passed authorizing or requiring the notification of local communities where sex offenders would be living. The dilemma associated with community notification is balancing the public's right to be informed with the need to successfully reintegrate offenders within the community. Wisconsin was one of the 50 state jurisdictions that enacted a sex offender community notification statute. This project was an in-depth study of that state's experience from the vantage point of several groups affected by the community notification process. This data collection contains three surveys that were conducted from January 1998 through mid-September 1998: (1) a survey of 704 neighborhood residents at 22 community notification meetings throughout the state (Part 1), (2) a statewide survey of 312 police and sheriff agencies (Part 2), and (3) a statewide survey of 128 probation and parole agents and their supervisors from units with sex offender caseloads (Part 3). Variables in Part 1 include how respondents found out about the date and place of the community notification meeting, respondents' opinions of the purpose of the meeting, how clearly the purpose of meeting was stated, how the meeting went, outcomes, rating of information presented, if materials were handed out, if the materials were helpful, and respondents' level of concern after the meeting. Enforcement agency data (Part 2) include variables such as type of agency, type of jurisdiction, population size, if the agency designated a special staff member to coordinate the sex offender registration and notification functions, if the agency had policies regarding registration of sex offenders and community notification about sex offenders, if the agency attended statewide training, who participated i... Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03015

Contents:

Part 1: Community Notification Meeting Data; Part 2: Law Enforcement Agency Data; Part 3: Probation and Parole Agents Data

Notes:

Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2006-09-15.

OCLC:

61153318

Access Restriction:

Restricted for use by site license.