1 option
Brain Korea 21 phase II : a new evaluation model / Somi Seong, ... [and others].
Van Pelt Library LB2342.4.K6 B73 2008
Available
- Format:
- Book
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Brain Korea 21 (Project)--Evaluation.
- Brain Korea 21 (Project).
- Education, Higher--Korea (South)--Finance.
- Education, Higher.
- Government aid to higher education--Korea (South).
- Government aid to higher education.
- Finance.
- Evaluation.
- Korea (South).
- Physical Description:
- xxviii, 248 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm
- Place of Publication:
- Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2008.
- Summary:
- In the late 1990s, the Korea Ministry of Education and Human Resources, in response to concern over the relatively low standing of the nation's universities and researchers, launched the Brain Korea 21 program (BK21). BK21 seeks to make Korean research universities globally competitive and to produce more high-quality researchers in Korea. It provides fellowship funding to graduate students and professors in research groups at top Korean universities. Concentrating on the second phase of BK21, which will continue until 2012, the authors develop quantitative and qualitative models and methods to evaluate how well BK21 is fulfilling its goals, suggest a database of measures needed for that evaluation, and make suggestions for the future management of the program. The measurement methods proposed in this book can assess not only the progress of the BK21 program but also the health and development of the Korean university system as a whole. Korean university research could be stimulated further through a combination of competitive awards for project funding, portable fellowships for graduate students who would select their universities, and university access to capital for construction of first-rate research facilities.
- Contents:
- BK21 Program Structure 1
- Phase I and Phase II Comparison 3
- Significance of the Program 4
- Objective of the Study 5
- Approach 6
- Chapter 2 Implications of Phase I Program Evaluations for Phase II Evaluations 9
- Previous Performance Evaluations of BK21 Phase I 9
- Annual and Interim Evaluations 9
- Program-Level Evaluations 11
- Findings from Previous Evaluations 14
- Changes Resulting from BK21 Phase I 14
- Suggestions for Improving the Evaluation System 16
- Limitations of Previous Evaluations 17
- Implications for Designing the Phase II Evaluation Model 19
- Chapter 3 A Logic Model for Evaluating BK21 21
- Literature Review and Focus Group Interviews 21
- Developing the Logic Model 23
- Identifying the Goals and Missions 26
- Missions 29
- Performance Milestones 31
- Goals and Missions Identified for the Logic Model 33
- Program Inputs 34
- BK21 Funding 34
- Strategy 37
- Unit of Support 40
- Recipient Selection Criteria 41
- Performance Evaluation Criteria 42
- Other Operational Mechanisms 42
- Incentives, Activities, Outputs, and Outcomes of the Program 44
- Incentives 44
- Activities 47
- Outputs 48
- Outcomes 54
- Other Observations 55
- Chapter 4 Quantitative Model to Assess BK21 Program Outcomes 59
- Summary of Phase I Statistics 61
- Potential Approaches 64
- Unadjusted Comparisons of BK21 Winners and Losers 67
- Ordinary Least Squares, Matching, and Propensity Score 69
- Fixed-Effects and Difference-in-Differences Models 71
- Regression Discontinuity 74
- Other Strategies 76
- Quantitative Model 77
- Heterogeneous Funding 80
- The Power to Identify Impacts 81
- Data for Use in Validating the Model 81
- ISI Data 81
- Ministry of Education Data 83
- Validation of the Model 83
- Pre-Treatment Trends 84
- Another Possible Comparison Group: Nonapplicants 88
- Validation 90
- Variations on the Specification 96
- Quality 97
- Social Science and Humanities 100
- Other Aspects of the Logic Model 100
- Simultaneous Equations Methods 102
- International Competitiveness 104
- Simulation: Ability to Precisely Estimate Effects at Phase II Funding Levels 105
- Simulation: Outside Funding 107
- Implications for Data Collection 109
- Chapter 5 Metrics and Measurement for Program Evaluation 111
- General Issues of Measurement 112
- Reliability 113
- Validity 114
- Direct and Indirect Measures 114
- Cost Versus Benefit 115
- Strategy for Framing Evaluation Measures 116
- Matching Measures to Goals 117
- Selecting Among Candidate Measures 118
- Adding to Korea's Research Manpower Pool 132
- Highly Educated Workforce Employment 134
- High-Quality Globally Competitive Research 135
- Measuring Quality of Research Output 135
- Consistent Measures of Quality Within Fields 138
- Measures of Quality Across All Fields 144
- Relative Research Quality Measures 146
- Changes to University/Department Infrastructure 146
- Fostering a Competitive Environment Within Korea 147
- Other Measures of Prestigious and Competitive Graduate Research 150
- Measuring Enhanced University-Industry Collaboration 154
- Measuring Enhanced Regional University Standing and Industry Linkage 156
- Industrial Research Quantity, Quality, and National Labor Productivity 159
- Chapter 6 Database Design to Support BK21 Program Evaluation and Measurement 161
- Priority Among Proposed Measures 161
- Database Design and Content 166
- Format of Database Design Entries 173
- Chapter 7 Future Development of BK21 and University Research in Korea 177
- A Good Model for an Allocation System 178
- Applying the Model to Korea 179
- Research Project Funding 179
- Portable Student Fellowships 181
- Facilities and Infrastructure Funding 182
- Promotion of Specific Regions or Fields 183
- BK21 Program Management 183
- Requirements for University and Department Governance 183
- Changing the Korean System 184
- Appropriate Scale and Number of Research Universities 185
- Analogy to the U.S. System 185
- Applying the Proposed Measurement Tools 189
- Directions for a Phase II Evaluation System 195
- Phase II Program Goals and Characteristics Identified by the Logic Model 196
- Quantitative Model and Data Requirements 196
- Metrics, Measures, and Database to Assess Program Effects and to Monitor Progress 197
- Assessing the Quality of Program Outputs and Outcomes 199
- Quality of Research 199
- Quality of the Highly Educated Workforce 200
- Concentration Strategy and Competition Rule 201
- Suggestions for Long-Term Changes in the Korean Scientific Research and Education System 202
- Balancing Competition and Stability in Funding 202
- Portable Student Fellowships 203
- Infrastructure Funding 203
- Improving University and Department Governance 204
- Preconditions for the Proposed Changes 204
- Enhancing Program Evaluation and Management Capabilities 205
- A Performance Evaluation Metrics Used in Previous Evaluations of Phase I 207
- B Interview Guides for Representatives of Participants, Policymakers, and Users Related to the University Research and Education System 209
- C Selection Criteria for Applied Science Research Groups: Phase II 217
- D Table with Lagged Outcomes 219
- E Research Data Series 221
- F Education Data Series 229
- G Industry Data Series 237
- H General Data Series 243.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 245-248).
- ISBN:
- 9780833043214
- 0833043218
- OCLC:
- 191005802
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.