My Account Log in

1 option

Brain Korea 21 phase II : a new evaluation model / Somi Seong, ... [and others].

Van Pelt Library LB2342.4.K6 B73 2008
Loading location information...

Available This item is available for access.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Contributor:
Sŏng, So-mi.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Brain Korea 21 (Project)--Evaluation.
Brain Korea 21 (Project).
Education, Higher--Korea (South)--Finance.
Education, Higher.
Government aid to higher education--Korea (South).
Government aid to higher education.
Finance.
Evaluation.
Korea (South).
Physical Description:
xxviii, 248 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm
Place of Publication:
Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2008.
Summary:
In the late 1990s, the Korea Ministry of Education and Human Resources, in response to concern over the relatively low standing of the nation's universities and researchers, launched the Brain Korea 21 program (BK21). BK21 seeks to make Korean research universities globally competitive and to produce more high-quality researchers in Korea. It provides fellowship funding to graduate students and professors in research groups at top Korean universities. Concentrating on the second phase of BK21, which will continue until 2012, the authors develop quantitative and qualitative models and methods to evaluate how well BK21 is fulfilling its goals, suggest a database of measures needed for that evaluation, and make suggestions for the future management of the program. The measurement methods proposed in this book can assess not only the progress of the BK21 program but also the health and development of the Korean university system as a whole. Korean university research could be stimulated further through a combination of competitive awards for project funding, portable fellowships for graduate students who would select their universities, and university access to capital for construction of first-rate research facilities.
Contents:
BK21 Program Structure 1
Phase I and Phase II Comparison 3
Significance of the Program 4
Objective of the Study 5
Approach 6
Chapter 2 Implications of Phase I Program Evaluations for Phase II Evaluations 9
Previous Performance Evaluations of BK21 Phase I 9
Annual and Interim Evaluations 9
Program-Level Evaluations 11
Findings from Previous Evaluations 14
Changes Resulting from BK21 Phase I 14
Suggestions for Improving the Evaluation System 16
Limitations of Previous Evaluations 17
Implications for Designing the Phase II Evaluation Model 19
Chapter 3 A Logic Model for Evaluating BK21 21
Literature Review and Focus Group Interviews 21
Developing the Logic Model 23
Identifying the Goals and Missions 26
Missions 29
Performance Milestones 31
Goals and Missions Identified for the Logic Model 33
Program Inputs 34
BK21 Funding 34
Strategy 37
Unit of Support 40
Recipient Selection Criteria 41
Performance Evaluation Criteria 42
Other Operational Mechanisms 42
Incentives, Activities, Outputs, and Outcomes of the Program 44
Incentives 44
Activities 47
Outputs 48
Outcomes 54
Other Observations 55
Chapter 4 Quantitative Model to Assess BK21 Program Outcomes 59
Summary of Phase I Statistics 61
Potential Approaches 64
Unadjusted Comparisons of BK21 Winners and Losers 67
Ordinary Least Squares, Matching, and Propensity Score 69
Fixed-Effects and Difference-in-Differences Models 71
Regression Discontinuity 74
Other Strategies 76
Quantitative Model 77
Heterogeneous Funding 80
The Power to Identify Impacts 81
Data for Use in Validating the Model 81
ISI Data 81
Ministry of Education Data 83
Validation of the Model 83
Pre-Treatment Trends 84
Another Possible Comparison Group: Nonapplicants 88
Validation 90
Variations on the Specification 96
Quality 97
Social Science and Humanities 100
Other Aspects of the Logic Model 100
Simultaneous Equations Methods 102
International Competitiveness 104
Simulation: Ability to Precisely Estimate Effects at Phase II Funding Levels 105
Simulation: Outside Funding 107
Implications for Data Collection 109
Chapter 5 Metrics and Measurement for Program Evaluation 111
General Issues of Measurement 112
Reliability 113
Validity 114
Direct and Indirect Measures 114
Cost Versus Benefit 115
Strategy for Framing Evaluation Measures 116
Matching Measures to Goals 117
Selecting Among Candidate Measures 118
Adding to Korea's Research Manpower Pool 132
Highly Educated Workforce Employment 134
High-Quality Globally Competitive Research 135
Measuring Quality of Research Output 135
Consistent Measures of Quality Within Fields 138
Measures of Quality Across All Fields 144
Relative Research Quality Measures 146
Changes to University/Department Infrastructure 146
Fostering a Competitive Environment Within Korea 147
Other Measures of Prestigious and Competitive Graduate Research 150
Measuring Enhanced University-Industry Collaboration 154
Measuring Enhanced Regional University Standing and Industry Linkage 156
Industrial Research Quantity, Quality, and National Labor Productivity 159
Chapter 6 Database Design to Support BK21 Program Evaluation and Measurement 161
Priority Among Proposed Measures 161
Database Design and Content 166
Format of Database Design Entries 173
Chapter 7 Future Development of BK21 and University Research in Korea 177
A Good Model for an Allocation System 178
Applying the Model to Korea 179
Research Project Funding 179
Portable Student Fellowships 181
Facilities and Infrastructure Funding 182
Promotion of Specific Regions or Fields 183
BK21 Program Management 183
Requirements for University and Department Governance 183
Changing the Korean System 184
Appropriate Scale and Number of Research Universities 185
Analogy to the U.S. System 185
Applying the Proposed Measurement Tools 189
Directions for a Phase II Evaluation System 195
Phase II Program Goals and Characteristics Identified by the Logic Model 196
Quantitative Model and Data Requirements 196
Metrics, Measures, and Database to Assess Program Effects and to Monitor Progress 197
Assessing the Quality of Program Outputs and Outcomes 199
Quality of Research 199
Quality of the Highly Educated Workforce 200
Concentration Strategy and Competition Rule 201
Suggestions for Long-Term Changes in the Korean Scientific Research and Education System 202
Balancing Competition and Stability in Funding 202
Portable Student Fellowships 203
Infrastructure Funding 203
Improving University and Department Governance 204
Preconditions for the Proposed Changes 204
Enhancing Program Evaluation and Management Capabilities 205
A Performance Evaluation Metrics Used in Previous Evaluations of Phase I 207
B Interview Guides for Representatives of Participants, Policymakers, and Users Related to the University Research and Education System 209
C Selection Criteria for Applied Science Research Groups: Phase II 217
D Table with Lagged Outcomes 219
E Research Data Series 221
F Education Data Series 229
G Industry Data Series 237
H General Data Series 243.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references (pages 245-248).
ISBN:
9780833043214
0833043218
OCLC:
191005802

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account