My Account Log in

3 options

The civil-military gap in the United States : does it exist, why, and does it matter? / Thomas S. Szayna ... [and others].

Online

Available online

View online

Online

Available online

View online
Van Pelt Library UA23 .C555 2007
Loading location information...

Available This item is available for access.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Contributor:
Szayna, Thomas S., 1960-
Triangle Institute for Security Studies.
Arroyo Center. Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program.
United States. Department of the Army.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Civil-military relations--United States.
Civil-military relations.
Armed Forces.
Public opinion.
United States.
United States--Armed Forces--Public opinion.
United States--Military policy.
Military policy.
Sociology, Military--United States.
Sociology, Military.
Physical Description:
xxi, 177 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm
Place of Publication:
Santa Monica, CA : RAND Corp., 2007.
Summary:
What is the potential for a divergence in views among civilian and military elites (sometimes referred to as the civil-military gap) to undermine military effectiveness? While there are some differences between the military and civilian survey respondents in the database examined by the authors, such differences did not appear in attitudes that are pertinent to civilian control of the military and military effectiveness. The major exception to this pattern related to such military personnel policies as women in combat, the military's policies with regard to sexual harassment, and whether gays should serve in the military. In contrast, most of the other measures of military effectiveness appear to be influenced more by views of the military threat facing the country and views of foreign policy-where military officers and civilians share similar perspectives.
This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Contents:
Objectives and Organization 9
Chapter 2 Toward a Framework for Thinking About Civil-Military Relations and Military Effectiveness 13
Central Premises of Our Approach 14
Context 15
Civilian Control 15
DoD Missions 16
The Institutional Environment 17
The Policymaking Process 20
Characteristics of the Policymaking Process 20
Key Steps in the Policymaking Process 23
Key Problems Affecting the Policymaking Process 24
Sources of Problems in the Policymaking Process 26
Realms of Potential Civil-Military Disagreement 30
Threat Assessment 32
Defense Resources 34
Force Design and Creation 36
Force Maintenance 39
Force Employment 41
Chapter 3 The TISS Data 45
Sample Design 46
Population 46
Sampling Frame 48
Methodological Issues That Affect Analytic Conclusions 50
Response Rates 50
Representativeness of the Sample 55
Comparability of the Survey Administration 60
Our Use of the TISS Data 63
Chapter 4 How Do the Military and Civilians Differ? 65
Analytical Model 66
Components of Model 70
Empirical Findings 79
Socio-Demographic Profile 79
Political Characteristics 81
Knowledge of and Confidence in the Military 86
View of Domestic Issues 90
Views of International Affairs 95
Discussion of Results 101
Chapter 5 Military and Civilian Perspectives 105
Analytical Framework 105
Civilian Control 106
Military Effectiveness 108
Threat Assessment 108
Defense Resources 110
Force Design and Creation 111
Force Maintenance 113
Force Employment 114
Research Approach 116
Results 116
Threat Assessment 116
Defense Resources 123
Force Design and Creation 129
Force Maintenance 136
Force Employment 141
Civilian Control 145
Discussion of Results 148
Chapter 6 Conclusions and Observations on Future U.S. Civil-Military Relations 151
Findings 152
Caveats 153
The Current Security Environment 154
Political Environment 155
Some Projections for the Future 156
Future Directions for Research 157
Appendix Civilian and Military Elites 161.
Notes:
This "analysis [used] a survey put together by a team of researchers associated with the Triangle Institute for Security Studies (TISS)."--P. xiv.
"The research reported here was sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3, Headquarters, Department of the Army. The research was conducted in RAND Arroyo Center's Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program."--Pref., p. iii.
"Prepared for the United States Army."
"MG-379-A"--P. [4] of cover.
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:
9780833041579
0833041576
OCLC:
85899059

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account