2 options
The Russell/Bradley dispute and its significance for twentieth-century philosophy / Stewart Candlish.
Van Pelt Library B1649.R94 C37 2007
Available
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Candlish, Stewart.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Russell, Bertrand, 1872-1970.
- Russell, Bertrand.
- Bradley, F. H. (Francis Herbert), 1846-1924.
- Bradley, F. H.
- Analysis (Philosophy)--History--20th century.
- Analysis (Philosophy).
- Idealism--History--20th century.
- Idealism.
- History.
- Physical Description:
- xix, 235 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm
- Place of Publication:
- Basingstoke [England] ; New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
- Summary:
- In the early twentieth century a philosophical debate took place between F. H. Bradley and Bertrand Russell concerning a range of connected issues of apparently technical significance: the nature and unity of the proposition; the proper account of truth; and the status of relations. The historical outcome was momentous: the demise of the philosophical movement known as British Idealism and its eventual replacement by various forms of Analytic Philosophy. Since then, a conception of this debate and its rights and wrongs has become entrenched in English-language philosophy. Stewart Candlish examines afresh not only the events of this formative period in twentieth-century thought but also the standard conception of them, providing a reassessment of Bradley's contribution to modern philosophy, new insight into the development of Russell's thought, and some surprising conclusions.
- Contents:
- 1 The Stereotypical Picture of the Russell/Bradley Dispute 1
- The protagonists 1
- Locating the dispute 3
- The stereotypical picture outlined 4
- The sources and pervasiveness of the stereotype 6
- Displacing the stereotype 18
- 2 Finding a Way into Bradley's Metaphysics 21
- Preliminary sketch 21
- The foundations of Bradley's thought 24
- Intellectual satisfaction 26
- Ideal experiment 27
- The sceptical principle, mark I 33
- The attack on predication 37
- The attack on external relations 39
- The sceptical principle, marks II and III 40
- The attack on internal relations 42
- To monism and idealism 44
- Contingency, sufficient reason and circularity 46
- 3 Judgment 49
- An initial contrast between Bradley and Russell on judgment 50
- Russell's 1903 binary relation theory of judgment 53
- The origins of the multiple relation theory of judgment 58
- The 1910 version 62
- The 1912 version 67
- The 1913 version 69
- The 1918 non-theory 73
- Subsequent developments 75
- 4 Truth 78
- Bradley and the coherence theory of truth 79
- Bradley on coherence and correspondence 81
- Russell and the correspondence theory of truth 85
- The derivation of Bradley's metaphysical theory of truth 89
- The nature of Bradley's metaphysical theory of truth 93
- The availability of the identity theory of truth 97
- Russell and the identity theory of truth 100
- Russell, the multiple relation theory, and correspondence 103
- 5 Grammar and Ontology 106
- The transparency thesis, the theory of descriptions, and the usual story 106
- The consequences of replacing the usual story 111
- Grammar, descriptions and analysis 115
- Negative propositions 120
- Universal propositions 124
- Subject-predicate grammar and the status of relations 128
- Subject-predicate grammar: substance and attribute 136
- 6 Relations 141
- The significance of relations 141
- Logic, metaphysics and internal relations 145
- Interpreting the doctrine of internal relations 150
- The development of Bradley's views on relations 155
- Russell, internality and unreality 163
- Bradley's arguments for the unreality of relations and their terms 167
- 7 Decline and Fall 174
- Health warning 174
- The decline of monistic idealism 174.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 189-224) and index.
- ISBN:
- 0230506852
- 9780230506855
- OCLC:
- 69021068
- Online:
- Contributor biographical information
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.