My Account Log in

1 option

Deterrence by diplomacy / Anne E. Sartori.

LIBRA JZ1305 .S37 2005
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Sartori, Anne E., 1966-
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Diplomacy.
Deterrence (Strategy).
Physical Description:
x, 164 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm
Place of Publication:
Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, [2005]
Summary:
Why are countries often able to communicate critical information using diplomacy? Why do countries typically use diplomacy honestly, despite incentives to bluff? Why are they often able to deter attacks using merely verbal threats? International relations theory is largely pessimistic about the prospects for effective diplomacy, yet leaders nevertheless expend much time and energy trying to resolve confiicts through verbal negotiations and public statements. Deterrence by Diplomacy challenges standard understandings of deterrence by analyzing it as a form of talk and reaches conclusions about the effectiveness of diplomacy that are much more optimistic.
Anne Sartori argues that diplomacy works precisely because it is so valuable. States take pains to use diplomacy honestly most of the time because doing so allows them to maintain reputations for honesty, which in turn enhance their ability to resolve future disputes using diplomacy rather than force. So, to maintain the effectiveness of their diplomacy, states sometimes acquiesce to others' demands when they might have been able to attain their goals through bluffs. Sartori theorizes that countries obtain a "trade" of issues over time; they get their way more often when they deem the issues more important, and concede more often when they deem the issues less important.
Deterrence by Diplomacy departs from traditional deterrence theory also in its implications about how states can increase the credibility of their threats. Traditional theory suggests that by fighting over small issues states can show resolve to fight over large ones. This book, which develops its arguments about effective diplomacy through a game-theoretic argument and tests the resulting implications using statistical analyses, points to an alternative road to credibility: states can make their threats more credible by sometimes honestly acquiescing when they do not consider the issues important enough to be worth a fight-in other words, by not crying "wolf."
Contents:
Three Misconceptions About Diplomacy 6
How Can a State Communicate That an Adversary Has Misjudged Its Resolve? 12
Part II How Bluffs Can Hurt a State's Diplomacy, and Honesty Provides the Ability to Communicate 17
Chapter 2 The Failure of Chinese Diplomacy, 1950 19
The Chinese Attempt at Deterrence 22
The U.S. Dismissal of China's Threats as Bluffs 26
Would the United States and China Have Fought if China's Threats Had Been Credible? 30
Why Did the United States Dismiss China's Threats As Bluffs? 32
Chapter 3 A Reputational Theory of Diplomacy 43
Reputations for Honesty and Reputations for Resolve 44
Audience Costs, Cheap Talk, and Diplomacy 49
The Game-Theoretic Model 52
Effective, Cheap Diplomacy 56
Part III Evidence That Honesty Matters 73
Chapter 4 Reputations for Honesty and the Success of Diplomacy 75
Central Empirical Implications of the Formal Model 77
Determining Empirical Implications of the Theoretical Model 78
Data and Methodology 81
The Escalation of International Disputes: Tests of the Theory 93
Robustness of the Empirical Results 99
Chapter 5 The Broader Importance of Reputations for Honesty 111
The Effect of the Defender's Reputation on States' Decisions to Begin Militarized Disputes and to Attempt Deterrence 112
The Role of the Military Balance 114
Appendix A Characterization of the Equilibrium 131
Factorization 136
Choosing Thresholds So That Each Player-Type Prefers Its Equilibrium Strategy to Other Strategies Played in Equilibrium 139
Checking That No Player Prefers to Deviate to a Strategy No Type Plays in Equilibrium 141
No Player Prefers to Deviate at a Node Other Than the Player's First Node in the Stage Game 145
Appendix B The Impact of Communication on War and on Welfare 146
Appendix C Implications of the Theory 149
Appendix D The Effects of Power Status, Contiguity, and Democracy 151.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references (pages [153]-160) and index.
ISBN:
0691116997
OCLC:
56493908

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account