1 option
Demonstrative proof in defence of God : a study of Titus of Bostra's Contra Manichaeos : the work's sources, aims and relation to its contemporary theology / by Nils Arne Pedersen.
LIBRA BR65.T853 A347 2004
Available from offsite location
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Pedersen, Nils Arne, 1959-
- Series:
- Nag Hammadi and Manichaean studies ; 56.
- Nag Hammadi and Manichaean studies, 0929-2470 ; v. 56
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Titus, of Bostra, Bishop of Bostra, active approximately 362-378. Against the Manichees.
- Titus.
- Manichaeism--Controversial literature--History and criticism.
- Manichaeism.
- Manichaeism--Controversial literature.
- Physical Description:
- xv, 575 pages ; 25 cm.
- Place of Publication:
- Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2004.
- Summary:
- This is the first extensive study of a major Patristic work, showing its importance for the history of Church and theology, Manichaean studies and the use of ancient philosophy. It includes a critical text and translation of central passages.
- Contents:
- 1 The main interpretation 1
- Excursion: Manichaeism as Christian Gnosis 6
- III Receptions, editions and scholarship history of Contra Manichaeos 66
- 1 Knowledge of Titus in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages 66
- 2 Reception of and scholarship on Contra Manichaeos from the end of the 16th century to De Lagarde's editions of the text in 1859 69
- 3 Contra Manichaeos as a source of knowledge on Manichaeism 78
- 4 Titus as a theological and philosophical writer 89
- 5 Text transmission and history of editions 109
- IV The historical and literary context for Titus of Bostra's Contra Manichaeos 120
- 2 The province of Arabia, conflicts between pagans and Catholics and the dating of Contra Manichaeos 120
- Excursion: Other works by Titus 128
- 3 Heresiology and anti-Manichaeism 129
- Excursion: Possible use of various patristic sources in Titus 146
- V The audience for Contra Manichaeos and the portrayal of Manichaeism that Titus wished to present to them 158
- 1 The two audiences 158
- 2 Titus's portrayal of Manichaeism as barbarism, irrationalism and as a philosophy 166
- 3 Titus's portrayal of Manichaeism as determinism and immorality 171
- VI The Manichaean texts used by Titus of Bostra 177
- 1 The relevance of the problem for this study 177
- 2 Heraclianus's information and Adda's works 178
- 3 The Manichaean source in Contra Manichaeos I + III.4-5 186
- 4 Other Manichaean sources in Contra Manichaeos Books III-IV 199
- 5 The Manichaean criticism of the Creator God in Contra Manichaeos III.7 206
- b Discussion of the non-Catholic polemical interpretations of the OT 209
- c The philosophical and Marcionite background for the idea of the Creator's ignorance 216
- d The philosophical and Gnostic background for the idea of the Creator's [characters not reproducible] 225
- e The positive evaluation of man's acquisition of knowledge in Gnostic texts 234
- f Comparison with the original Manichaean literature 237
- g Comparison with Augustine's portrayal of Manichaeism 243
- h Comparison with Emperor Julian's treatise: Contra Galilaeos 249
- i Problems and different solutions 251
- VII Titus of Bostra's philosophical position 255
- 1 Titus's knowledge of philosophers and philosophical texts 255
- 2 Titus's concept of God and his basic philosophical position 259
- 3 The "common concepts" 280
- 4 Titus's philosophical psychology 297
- VIII Titus of Bostra's interpretation of the Paradise narrative 320
- 2 The image of God in man 321
- 3 God's foreknowledge and man's disobedience 326
- 4 Comparison with earlier writers 331
- 5 Death as a benefit 343
- a Titus's view of death in Book II and Book IV 343
- b Death did not harm man 349
- c The background to these ideas in the earlier tradition 353
- 6 Summarising remarks 363
- IX Comparison between the exegesis of Genesis in Titus of Bostra and in a number of writers in "the Antiochene School" 366
- 1 Plan for the following comparison 366
- 2 Outline of the interpretation of the Paradise narrative in Eusebius of Caesarea 369
- 3 Comparison with Eusebius of Emesa's interpretation of the Paradise narrative 371
- 4 Comparison with Diodore of Tarsus's interpretation of the Paradise narrative 379
- 5 Problems concerning Coisliniana, fragment no. 115 382
- 6 Comparison with Theodore of Mopsuestia's interpretation of the Paradise narrative in his commentary on Genesis, illustrated by other Theodore fragments 392
- 7 Comparison with Theodore of Mopsuestia's work: Against those who say that men sin by nature and not by intention 407
- 8 Comparison with the Constitutiones Apostolorum 414
- 9 Hypotheses to explain similarities between interpretations of the Paradise narrative 415
- X Summary of the study's most important conclusions 420
- XI Critical examinations of the text 424.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages [475]-516) and indexes.
- ISBN:
- 9004138838
- OCLC:
- 54974497
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.