The sceptical road : Aenesidemus' appropriation of Heraclitus / by Roberto Polito.
- Format:
-
- Author/Creator:
-
- Series:
-
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
-
- Physical Description:
- viii, 202 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm.
- Place of Publication:
- Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2004.
- Summary:
- The book addresses the question of the alleged Heracliteanism of the Sceptic philosopher Aenesidemus of Cnossus. It argues that Aenesidemus merely intented to offer a Sceptical interpretation of Heraclitus, and that the ideas which are incorporated in it voice distinctive features of his Scepticism.
- Contents:
-
- Part 1 Knowledge
- Chapter 1 The Sources 13
- I.1 Diogenes and Aenesidemus (Diog. Laert. 9.106) 13
- I.2 Diogenes' Account of Scepticism 20
- I.3 Sceptical Literature 24
- I.4 The Path (Sext. Emp. PH1.210) 27
- I.5 Sextus versus Aenesidemus 34
- Chapter 2 Truth (Sext. Emp. M. 8.8) 40
- II.1 Appearances 40
- II.2 Agreement 51
- II.3 Heraclitus on Disagreement 57
- II.4 The Opposites 59
- Chapter 3 Scepticism 65
- III.1 Reality 65
- III.2 Nature 69
- III.3 Sensation 72
- III.4 Medical Empiricism 78
- III.5 The Tropes 82
- III.6 Sense-Perception 89
- III.7 Intellect 93
- III.8 Sceptical Arguments 97
- Part 2 The Soul
- Chapter 4 Soul and the Body 108
- IV.1 The Ruling-Part-of-the-Soul (Sext. Emp. 8.349; Tert. DA 15) 108
- IV.2 Mind and the Senses (Sext. Emp. 8.350; Tert. DA 14) 119
- IV.3 The 'Channels' of Sensation 130
- IV.4 The Substance of the Soul (Tert. DA 9) 139
- Chapter 5 Sextus on Heraclitus (M. 7.126-134) 149
- V.1 The Criterion of Truth 149
- V.2 Sextus and Aenesidemus 156
- V.3 Interpreting Heraclitus 165
- V.4 Common Reason 169
- Time (Sext Emp. M 10.216-218) 180
- Motion (Sext. Emp. M. 10.38) 190.
- Notes:
-
- Revision of the author's thesis (Ph. D.)--Cambridge, 1999, originally presented under the title: Aenesidemus' interpretation of Heraclitus.
- Includes bibliographical references (pages [193]-197) and index.
- ISBN:
- 9004137424
- OCLC:
- 54103881
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.