My Account Log in

3 options

Heuristics and biases in decisions to stay with or renege from sequential waits / Narayan Janakiraman.

LIBRA HF003 2003 .J33
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
LIBRA Diss. POPM2003.294
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
LIBRA Microfilm P38:2003
Loading location information...

Mixed Availability Some items are available, others may be requested.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Manuscript
Microformat
Thesis/Dissertation
Author/Creator:
Janakiraman, Narayan.
Contributor:
Meyer, Robert J., advisor.
University of Pennsylvania.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Penn dissertations--Marketing.
Marketing--Penn dissertations.
Penn dissertations--Managerial science and applied economics.
Managerial science and applied economics--Penn dissertations.
Local Subjects:
Penn dissertations--Marketing.
Marketing--Penn dissertations.
Penn dissertations--Managerial science and applied economics.
Managerial science and applied economics--Penn dissertations.
Physical Description:
viii, 195 pages : illustrations ; 29 cm
Production:
2003.
Summary:
Consumer wait situations such as being put on hold during a telephone call require the consumer to make continuous decisions on whether to stay on line and receive service or terminate the current wait and reinitiate a new wait. The key question that is addressed in my dissertation is how do consumers decide how long to wait and when to renege? I expect that going into a wait situation consumers are likely to hold optimistic priors about wait completions. Further, as the wait progresses, rational instincts to stay during the wait are increasingly likely to be affected by various psychological factors such as emotional cost of the wait, uncertainty about the wait, perceptions about likely length of future wait and the extent to which prior wait expectations are violated. The net effect is that I expect consumers to abandon waits when they perceive the utility of the current wait net of the psychological factors as less than that associated with starting a new wait. I study renege decisions in contexts where it is never optimal to renege and in contexts where it is optimal to renege within a small window of time and show that consumer decisions to renege are far from optimal and are likely driven by psychological factors. Further, I show how moderators such as activity within a wait, often used as time management strategies by marketers, are likely to affect decisions to stay or renege.
Notes:
Adviser: Robert J. Meyer.
Thesis (Ph.D. in Marketing) -- University of Pennsylvania, 2003.
Includes bibliographical references.
Local Notes:
University Microfilms order no.: 3109188.
OCLC:
244973299

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account