1 option
The trial of Robert W. Houston, versus General John Dicks, and others, members of a court martial, Nathaniel W. Sample, brigade inspector, Molton C. Rogers, esq., judge advocate, and Daniel Moore, deputy marshal. Being an action of trespass, instituted in the Court of common pleas, of Lancaster county, Pennsylvania. Containing the proceedings and opinion of the said court. Also, the arguments of counsel before the Supreme court, at a special session, held at Lancaster, on the 6th March, 1817, and the opinions of the judges of said court, delivered on the 19th May, 1817, reversing the opinion of the court below. / By George B. Porter, esq.
Kislak Center for Special Collections - Rare Book Collection KF228 .H68
Available in person
Request an item
Access options
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Houston, Robert W.
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 144, 54 pages ; 24 cm
- Place of Publication:
- Philadelphia : Printed by L. R. Bailey, 1817.
- Notes:
- "This is an action against John Dicks, John M'Clure, James Ankrim, John Hamilton, John Clark, John Andrews, James Boyd, George Bietz, John Dixon, George White, John Clemson, Joseph Wallace, Molton C. Rogers, esq. and Nathaniel W. Sample, junr. for a trespass."--p. 19.
- The counsel were: For plaintiff, James Hopkins, esq.; for defendants, Thomas Duncan, Molton C. Rogers, George B. Porter, esquires.
- "Opinion of Chief Justice Tilghman, Daniel Moore (plaintiff in error) vs. Robert W. Houston."--p. [1]-25 at end.
- "Sketch of Mr. Hopkins's argument."--p. [26]-54 at end.
- Cited in:
- Shaw & Shoemaker 42327
- Sabin 64251
- OCLC:
- 10962953
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.