1 option
Christian origins and the language of the Kingdom of God / Michael L. Humphries ; with a foreword by Burton L. Mack.
LIBRA BS2585.2 .H85 1999
Available from offsite location
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Humphries, Michael L., 1953-
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Bible. Mark III, 19-30--Criticism, interpretation, etc.
- Bible.
- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism).
- Christianity--Origin.
- Christianity.
- Kingdom of God.
- Devil.
- Physical Description:
- viii, 98 pages ; 24 cm
- Place of Publication:
- Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press, [1999]
- Summary:
- Traditionally, scholars have traced the origin of Christianity to a single source -- the kingdom of God as represented in the message of the historical Jesus. Through a rhetorical critical analysis of one of the most important texts in early Christian literature (the Beelzebul controversy), Michael L. Humphries addresses the issue of Christian origins, demonstrating how the language of the kingdom of God is best understood according to its locative or taxonomic effect where the demarcation of social and cultural boundaries contributes to the emergence of this new social foundation. Humphries focuses on the Beelzebul controversy because the text plays a significant role in the history of New Testament scholarship; it is one of the few texts frequently regarded as a key to the interpretation of Jesus's understanding of the kingdom of God and thus a point of significant contention in the scholarly debate. The Beelzebul controversy exists in two versions -- Q and Mark -- and thereby allows the study to engage the import of the kingdom language at the point of juxtaposition between two distinct textual representations. This makes it possible to deal directly with the issue of the disparity of texts in the synoptic tradition. Humphries suggests that these two versions of the same controversy indicate two distinct social trajectories wherein the kingdom of God comes to mean something quite different in each case but that nevertheless they demonstrate a similarity in theoretical effect where the language contributes to the emergence of relatively distinct social formations. Humphries establishes the Q and Markan versions of the Beelzebul controversy as relatively sophisticated compositions that are formally identified as elaborate chreiai (a literary form used in the teaching of rhetoric at the secondary and post-secondary level of Greco-Roman education) and that offer an excellent example of the rhetorical manipulation of language in the development of social and cultural identity.
- Contents:
- 1. The Scholarship and Theoretical Considerations 1
- 2. Beelzebul, Ruler of Demons 13
- 3. The Chreia and Elaboration 23
- 4. The Language of the Kingdom in the Q Version of the Beelzebul Controversy 27
- 5. The Language of the Kingdom in the Markan Version of the Beelzebul Controversy 46
- Conclusion: Christian Origins and Demythology 62.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 67-94) and index.
- ISBN:
- 0809322307
- OCLC:
- 39724124
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.