My Account Log in

4 options

Explaining away behavior : scientific analysis and the transformation of acts into occurrences / John Monterosso.

LIBRA BF001 1997 .M778
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
LIBRA -
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
LIBRA Diss. POPM1997.339
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
LIBRA microfilm P38:1997
Loading location information...

Mixed Availability Some items are available, others may be requested.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Manuscript
Microformat
Thesis/Dissertation
Author/Creator:
Monterosso, John.
Contributor:
Gleitman, Henry, advisor.
University of Pennsylvania.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Penn dissertations--Psychology.
Psychology--Penn dissertations.
Local Subjects:
Penn dissertations--Psychology.
Psychology--Penn dissertations.
Physical Description:
vi, 124 pages ; 29 cm
Production:
1997.
Summary:
In ordinary person perception, observers make a distinction between voluntary and involuntary behaviors. Generally, social accountability is restricted to those behaviors that are considered voluntary. Scientific explanations of behavior can at times undermine the conception that the explained behavior is voluntary. In light of the great many recent advances in the sciences that target human behavior, this is an increasingly important issue. The experiments reported below examine the tendency of explanations to "devoluntarize" behavior as well as impact related judgments such as blame worthiness and deserved punishment. The following three aspects of explanations were manipulated: (1) the prevalence of the behavior given the explanatory antecedent, (2) the deterrability of the behavior given the explanatory antecedent, and (3) the type of explanatory antecedent cited--physiological or experiential. The effects of the first two factors on the degree of devoluntarization were both statistically significant though surprisingly minor. The type of explanation cited had a large and highly reliable effect, and was the only independent variable to reliably effect all dependent measures related to volition. Devoluntarization appears to depend not on the certainty with which the explained behavior is shown to follow from antecedents, but rather on the explanation's effectiveness at getting subjects to adopt an object attributional framework.
Notes:
Supervisor: Henry Gleitman.
Thesis (Ph.D. in Psychology) -- University of Pennsylvania, 1997.
Includes bibliographical references.
Local Notes:
University Microfilms order no.: 98-14890.
OCLC:
187457348

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account