My Account Log in

1 option

Emancipation and illusion : rationality and gender in Habermas's theory of modernity / by Marie Fleming.

Van Pelt Library B3258.H324 F585 1997
Loading location information...

Available This item is available for access.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Fleming, Marie, Ph. D.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Habermas, Jürgen.
Reason.
Enlightenment.
Sex role.
Postmodernism.
Civilization, Modern.
Physical Description:
243 pages ; 24 cm
Place of Publication:
University Park, Pa. : Pennsylvania State University Press, [1997]
Summary:
An analysis of the problems of rationality and gender in Habermasian theory.
In this comprehensive analysis of Jurgen Habermas's philosophy and social theory, Marie Fleming takes strong issue with habermas over his understanding of rationality and the life-world, emancipation, history, and gender. Throughout the book she focuses attention on the various ways in which an idea of emancipation motivates and shapes his universalist theory and how it persists over several major changes in methodology. her critique of Habermas begins from the view that universalism has to include a vision of gender equality, and she asks why habermas, despite deeply held concerns about equality and inclusiveness, repeatedly and systematically relegates matters of gender to secondary status in his social and moral theory. She extends her critique to a range of issues in his theory of rationality and examines what she views as his very problematical claims about truthfulness, art, and bourgeois intimacy.
The point of Fleming's critique of Habermas is not to dispute universalism, but to build on the key universalist principles of inclusiveness and equality. She is not persuaded by the view, shared by both sympathizers of habermas and his postmodern critics, that to be fore or against Habermas is to be for or against universalism. Her intention rather is to show that Habermas's theory of modernity is so structured that it cannot achieve its universalist aims. Contending that his theory is not universalist enough, she claims that universalism has to be reconceived as a radical, critical, and historical project.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references (pages [227]-236) and index.
ISBN:
027101654X
0271016558
OCLC:
35269950

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account