Classification of advanced practice nursing functions using the nursing intervention classification taxonomy / Adrienne E. Kirby.

Format:

Book

Manuscript

Microformat

Thesis/Dissertation

Author/Creator:

Kirby, Afrienne E.

Contributor:

Brooten, Dorothy A., advisor.

University of Pennsylvania.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Penn dissertations--Nursing.

Nursing--Penn dissertations.

Nursing.

Academic Dissertations as Topic.

Medical Subjects:

Nursing.

Academic Dissertations as Topic.

Local Subjects:

Penn dissertations--Nursing.

Nursing--Penn dissertations.

Physical Description:

xii, 237 leaves ; 29 cm

Production:

1996.

Summary:

The American Nurses Association (ANA) and the International Council of Nurses (ICN) have identified the development and testing of nursing classification systems to describe nursing practice as a priority for nursing (ANA, 1989; ICN, 1993). In recent years, several classification systems have been developed to label the elements of nursing practice. Clinical testing of these systems is required to evaluate their adequacy. One such system, the Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC) Taxonomy, has been proposed to be applicable to all level of nurse provider, in all settings, and with all patient populations.

In the current study, nursing functions performed by Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) who provided Transitional Follow-up Care (Brooten et al., 1991, 1994, 1995), to women post unplanned cesarean birth were classified using the NIC Taxonomy. The Transitional Care model consists of a comprehensive program of discharge planning and home follow-up care for high cost, high risk populations.

A secondary analysis of the randomized controlled trial, "Early Discharge of Women Post Unplanned Cesarean Birth" (Brooten et al., 1994) was performed. Latent content analysis was employed to classify statements of nursing functions from the nursing process logs for the early discharge group (n = 61) using the NIC Taxonomy.

Adequacy of the taxonomy was determined using the criteria for evaluating the relationship between theory and research proposed by Fawcett and Downs (1992). The taxonomy was found to possess significance, operational adequacy, and empirical adequacy. Mutual exclusiveness was not consistently found at the third level. Recommendations for modification of the taxonomy are presented. The taxonomy provided a thorough description of APN care. There were statistically significant differences in functions based on site of care and patient morbidity. No differences were found based on patient educational level.

Notes:

Supervisor: Dorothy Brooten.

Thesis (Ph.D. in Nursing) -- University of Pennsylvania, 1996.

Includes bibliographical references.

Local Notes:

University Microfilms order no.: 96-27944.

OCLC:

244969626