My Account Log in

1 option

Rethinking abortion : equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics / Mark A. Graber.

LIBRA HQ767.5.U5 G734 1996
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Graber, Mark A.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Abortion--Political aspects--United States.
Abortion.
Abortion--Political aspects.
United States.
Abortion--Government policy--United States.
Abortion--Government policy.
Abortion--Moral and ethical aspects--United States.
Abortion--Moral and ethical aspects.
Physical Description:
x, 244 pages ; 24 cm
Place of Publication:
Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1996.
Summary:
Mark Graber looks at the history of abortion law in action to argue that the only defensible, constitutional approach to the issue is to afford all women equal choice - abortion should remain legal or bans should be strictly enforced. Steering away from metaphysical critiques of privacy, Graber compares the philosophical, constitutional, and democratic merits of the two systems of abortion regulation witnessed in the twentieth-century: pre-Roe v. Wade statutory prohibitions on abortion and Roe's ban on significant state interference with the market for safe abortion services. He demonstrates that before Roe, pro-life measures were selectively and erratically administered, thereby subverting our constitutional commitment to equal justice. Claiming that these measures would be similarly administered if reinstated, the author seeks to increase support for keeping abortion legal, even among those who have reservations about its morality. Abortion should remain legal, Graber argues, because statutory bans on abortion have a history of being enforced in ways that intentionally discriminate against poor persons and persons of color. In the years before Roe, the same law enforcement officials who routinely ignored and sometimes assisted those physicians seeking to terminate pregnancies for their private patients too often prevented competent abortionists from offering the same services to the general public. This double standard violated the fundamental human and constitutional right of equal justice under law, a right that has powerful roots in the American political tradition and that remains a major concern of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
0691011427
OCLC:
33164306

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account